we know right , that the current treaties very are not sufficient and that in the future is necessary to develop better and union different structure , therefore perustuslaillisempi structure , which also expresses more clearly , what member states and the union is . 
firstly , kohtaamiemme economic and social difficulties , is there , although it is a sustainable growth and the years efforts , all our citizens from . 
the situation , which is unacceptable particularly many for transport and agriculture , which is , improve . 
procedures on in itself is a good thing , but is ensure the , that system is to be political we have ever suffered . 
they too is now clear of rights , which in their must measures . 
i agree with his with , when he warned some of bizarre return to intergovernmental methods . 
many of us want national member states of federation . 
the rapporteurs have stressed debate quality and also the need to further , of course , . i can other than agree with them . 
them i say that , as before , must speech is to be at the time and situation , because political speech must always be realistic and linked to real situation and objectives , which we all share . 
i would like , that this this reinforced cooperation and to the through some examples of the european new opportunities . 
the vote will take place today at 12.30 p.m . 
the commission is cannot accept amendment no 12 . 
i am voting for invested a considerable amount . 
also the european court of auditors reports constantly is the this failure , which is greece portugal . 
this is , we voted for report . 
of the such buses are not only more and internationally for but also more environmentally friendly , because they consume less fuel passengers towards . 
report is also benchmarking best practices to the eu : in . 
binding and all a charter of fundamental rights , which would completely legally binding rights , could lead to difficulties at a later stage . 
i thank them both their excellent work . 
we believe that it is cannot but to already less than three months ' time in nice , which is why we already only this is why we cannot support it , that charter of fundamental rights in the treaty nice summit . 
- ( de ) csu the of the european parliament group is welcome the proposal before us , that the charter of fundamental rights together one and is visible citizens : the fundamental rights eu institutions and the plants . 
charter of fundamental rights of the the liberal europe . 
actually i would have liked this charter of fundamental rights freezing of assets , so that should have been to the work on , as very many ngos different union countries propose . 
queiró , on behalf report ( a5-0248 / 2000 ) the european union hungary on accession negotiations and progress ( com ( 1999 ) 505 - c5-0028 / 2000 - 1997 / 2175 ( cos ) ) ; 
it therefore i would like proposes , that parliament is you no longer be a next year at all yleismietintöä but mere individual candidate countries on reports , so that we clear , that we negotiations differentiated progress . 
i also to it , that previous presidencies and the commission the preparations for the presidency france can , at least i hope , to the council nice meeting quite precise of it . 
i said it and i can say the very now , that the france is leave any in difficulties , which is of course , that we should not time and means to each of the . 
this question is , of course , fully justified , but the is to right and exactly . 
enlargement for the , and we have is to the agreements and visionary . 
which any intergovernmental conference result is enough to satisfy the enlargement enormous mukautumispainetta . 
the second great change , which we have witnessed and which the european must to , is market and economic competition rapid change in a . 
fourthly : the is the second principle , that they countries , which have later , is fair opportunity to join the , which have earlier . 
if eu : the level we need to achieve great and long-term investment , should think it , that member states are mean less pollution have in such cases the long transitional periods . 
start and crime torjunnassakin apply we countries quickly come up and the european cooperation interests . 
let us bigger trade flows , which are now the european union and central and eastern european countries between . 
i was pleased that the commission , the commissioner now finally started to citizens , that the fears , which is been , is need be . 
one thing is clear , however , - and i welcome the commission , that mr verheugen stressed it yet again the rules respect for democracy is to be transitional period . 
we need this the commission , because although we aid is will , we sometimes lacks the means . 
this is necessary , so that the european union we can to ourselves objectives own internal instructed the reforms . 
some important aspects and issues but we different with . 
this jeopardise the european union , the its independence in the future north america the and also the european common security and defence policy , because it that the also russia and other countries relations the risks . 
we hope , that is results and that enlargement for measures need to second the intergovernmental conference . 
. ( fr ) i briefly , as i did already , because i three minutes my first speech , unused . 
this is very important , and this point of view i am pleased that the commission , working on information campaign , which the commission commissioner verheugen wants and broad that decentralised . 
however , and this is the last words , because i would like , that me is right : i not , when , i playing half-heartedly , i would like , that enlargement is to so that could also be credible , is seriously , to ymmärretyiksi and be able to join peoples , and the candidate countries peoples that its own our people . 
this , i think is not necessary to discuss the financial perspective in enlargement . 
i say of it you this on any country . 
they said , the same reason the european union to join in . 
now i speak rapporteurs . 
me is been luottamustehtävä measures estonia on report as rapporteur . 
the moderate party , i very taxpayers ' money thriftily . 
i believe , that only it , you will find what they are , have a last years in . 
is not enough , the strategy is to more citizens . 
lithuania is a opportunity long-term economic growth . 
widest sense it is the european union and russia federation between cooperation . 
this is the second regrettable point : public opinion the european union support and the outside . 
wise a , foreign direct investment a was last in more than eur 5,45 billion . 
we should not to the , is especially we german . 
slovakia democracy is firmly , what we is been toisenkinlaisia experience . 
in this speech i to systematically the six points , which hungary , the situation is reason to stress the european union , the . 
therefore i pleased to see , that this subject was mr brok report , which was enlargement in general . 
this is not in any so true than nuclear power , which nuclear and take due the legitimate concerns are at risk to nuclear lobby against omimiksi . 
the level of of is a matter , i thank my colleagues and . 
in this report , which i is honour to present you and which also approved in committee unanimously , states , that legal authorities persuasion in the copenhagen political criteria are met . 
in this respect key is foreign and security policy high representatives javier solana , that without it , of course , in any way to reduce the commission role . 
malta is the problem but still it , that government and opposition are accession process different way , the european union and appreciates it , that this accession process is the . 
even the usa and the mexico varallisuustasot are closer to each other . that is why we support the internal market in a , flexible and demands the right how can a humane strategy . 
let me say in this context it , that also respect central and eastern european countries citizens , which ten years ago rohkenivat to the streets and to this process . 
the information society is important and new that new industries . 
we must to national legislation which is embodied community law favour be blinded by us . 
new , 10 eastern europe country is not this rich 00 . 
this is also live animal transport at , which is inhuman . 
now we shall now proceed demand for assessment all important legislation . 
in my must of course to the european union and it also must to , that the european regional development funds is to be the only on the laskennallisin regions and circles between . 
mr elmar brok referred to in his speech to rightly , that we all benefit from enlargement , particularly in this six months are apprehended irregularly crossing the we . 
rough is in the future great importance for environmental reasons , because we is to massatavarat out from road , and if we cannot be the by rail , we is to look at the waterways . 
also selfishness and populism are increased , and the euro more rate is hardly helped this . 
our message candidate countries , is that do not let the reports before us and cases the confuse head . 
unfortunately , this is currently too much parties , which are have ideology purveyed by and show therefore too little signs ideals and too much scorn for human dignity . 
if the and want free hankintaoikeutta perhekäyttöön is postponed , let us so . 
this will is still there , but it can jeopardise bureaucratic lack of transparency and some governments obvious , but is public resistance . 
where otherwise are maastricht treaty the promised millions of jobs ? 
when we currently being reviewed the treaties , some member states are already new reform . 
most international studies show , that enlargement is macro-economic benefit . 
small minorities , from no political group is but not the main objective , which slovenia policy is to join the european union as soon as possible . 
when the union quickly , should it strongly decentralize , as the eldr group laajentumiskannanotossa is . 
me was clear , that laitosmainen , säntillinen system , which in that country is , lead to many primarily at orphans and long-term effects on health . 
i would ask that this , the proposals supports . 
even we , european politicians , is too little knowledge of . 
cyprus will a bridge between the countries . 
i wish negotiators constant success their work in this important fact . 
also some other form communications is of course important member states and candidate countries between , so that information on the european union , what is it . 
we is not to lose more 1990s the pace . 
mr president , first i would like the socialist group position say romania to congratulate the rapporteur on his report excellent report . 
institutions , member states and we all , is it the , that we are challenge match for , so that we can also to each country citizens fears and to the european founders innoittaneen spirit , and to view . 
i is unfortunately a the , that many fine words and many figures hard opening and closure , the council is not driven this enlargement process with the political with . 
many union countries have have similar problems in development stage and can advise bulgaria and help it to cope with the problems , which because this currently is . 
democracy is not only majorities issue , but before all also minorities should to properly decision-making . 
candidate countries will be equal and the accession will depend on only for the development . 
the same time we should recognise lithuania countries such as the efforts lost for to . 
is this , we interests in to justice and vapausjärjestelmäämme romania , and this is certainly a argument citizens with the critical debate . 
a question , supports clearly , namely enlargement . 
my group therefore supports transitional periods of up to five years . 
mr president , we is necessary to positive movement enlargement . 
the debate these countries liittymisjärjestyksestä is , open , therefore , that is also todennettava , how very they progress within its reforms . 
i am pleased , that report is the positive view and so that slovenia - and delegation as i have to ensure the often , and also the commissioner is many times been delegation in - is made really much to meet criteria . 
i think the proposal is worth . 
these forms of violence and trafficking in women is condemn already now all way and in the eu in the candidate countries , and that the fight against is . 
finally , i would like to take this opportunity jakaakseni many members ideas and the problems , that is finally to question the european borders and enlargement consequences and the european parliament and the report . 
minutes of yesterday 's sitting the is been distributed . 
you . 
time time parliament states quite right , that citizens europe is a europe , which is rights properly in union legislation . 
i will vote legal and the internal market the siirtopyynnöstä . 
we know , that they foreign substances , which now we are talking about , are rarely dangerous toxins immediately , but they are long-term , long-lived and solve the substances , as dioxin , aflatoxin and heavy metals such as cadmium , lead and mercury . 
we can find guilty . 
if this laimentaminen allows , it is at least to supervisory instances , and is publish , that is laimentamista , because this problem is also to and the debate is public . 
as this is stress clearly the dioxin crisis was there the rules against criminals measures result . 
mr president , the thanks to members , which took the floor before me . 
this approach was absolutely . 
for example fishmeal , the limit value from ei-merellisille eläintuotteille proposed of . 
it is time to the principle of subsidiarity misleading interpretation , which is from the second kansakuntiamme brussels subjugation . 
the rapporteur , i it with , that is justified to all this and to his has said substances then , when they are not in itself , but the toxic kertymien to is increased . 
unfortunately , a part of perimätiedosta , i should like to healthy , is lost in agriculture , which animals are only manufacturing units and commodities . the . 
new regulations neighbours will be , harmonisation and simplify the very detailed and complex comparability between hospitals ' , which was earlier ripoteltu many different directives . 
the people , which ask ingredients very carefully , is i single occasion the relatively little . 
secondly : it to well but the situation for farmers , which are outside sources for our producers . their is to be much greater rehuaine-eriä . 
compensation is necessary , although is clear , that farmers myself are great concern produce their own livestock welfare . 
amendment no 18 the proposes the inclusion of water feed the . 
the commission proposes scientific risk assessments carried out on the basis of member states appropriate measures , so that the presence of feed can to . 
when takes account of the amendments , which is acceptable in this plenary , i , that parliament supports the proposal . 
the commission can therefore all , accept amendment no 15 completely 27 : of . 
i assume , that the it is not a success in this time . 
the commission is promised to work it on and is also announced that list , not prepared following morning by . 
farmers is quite simply to know more , and at least the percentage rate when commission what is going , what all and where extent these rehuseokset contain . 
finally , i would like to thank the rapporteur warmly , mr graefe zu baringdorf , and also mr roth-behrendt their reports here and i hope , that the council will take this issue constructive attitude and that we can create therefore together feed of on open system . 
all this is the bse crisis was of course , a whole book , which is a number of figures . 
is cannot accept harmful substances , which affect human and animal health . 
let us but positive of . 
the proposal before us is start many initiatives , which based on the security on the white paper . 
thank you very much , mr the commissioner . 
( parliament adopted the resolution ) . 
( parliament adopted the resolution ) . 
nicholson of winterbourne , on behalf committee on foreign affairs , human rights and common security and defence policy committee report ( a5-0247 / 2000 ) romania on the european union and for negotiations of ( com ( 1999 ) 510 c5-0033 / 2000 1997 / 2171 ( cos ) ) 
the third and perhaps they can least take the condition is it , that the council is new toimielinjärjestelyistä , which , community can measures effectively and democratically after enlargement . 
although article 13 principles we accept , is clear , that the european union the through secondary legislation goes in some cases very far and that of the candidate countries cannot be right to different culture . 
i finally , that the enlargement process is to gradually it more than the candidate countries meet requirements . 
. ( es ) takes account of the current situation and when they cast , which are begun the european union question enlargement , is important , that parliament a clear political signal to enlargement for . 
the european union to is the establishment , been peoples to . 
the 1993 the copenhagen european council criteria democratisation or competition capacity for resistance confirm ' community acquis ' disguised wild and disastrous of power . 
enlargement remnants of this situation may is there here just food products but populist aims and not just movements of . 
we is just this sitting the women and men equal opportunities on report , which be aware again , how bad community acquis situation is in practice in this area just . 
who could be represent the kopernikuksen and the john paul ii : the puolalta , budapest marttyyrikohtalon in 1956 kokeneelta unkarilta or as a symbol muodostuneelta pääkaupungilta , prahalta , which kansandemokratiat heads of state and syrjäyttivät were no small entrepreneurs freedom for murhatuksi people jan palachin people . 
greater europe , which is more tasks and responsibilities , needs new and greater resources . 
i welcome estonia elderly and pensioners and i hope , that the european union ensuring their elinmahdollisuuksistaan . 
if latvia is continue to and the european union to renewing its institutional framework and policies for enlargement , i see no reason why latvia , is to be union accession . 
if lithuania is continue to and the european union to renewing its institutional framework and policies for enlargement , i see no reason why lithuania , is to be union accession . 
progress is happened clearly also environmental , because poland is set up national ympäristösuojelurahaston and taken to the polluter pays principle . 
by poland common taloomme union shows justice new entrant to the justice , which it is without had long to . 
i , that the czech republic is soon to union . 
. ( i ) i welcome queiró report , which the hungary application of the european union , and i agree with most of his their conclusions . 
i , that bulgaria is in the near future union accession . 
poos report ( a5-0249 / 2000 ) 
it is balanced and fair position , which the council of ministers is be seriously into account . 
i hope this , , that the united nations under in negotiations to a conclusion , that cyprus greek and turkish proportion could together with the enjoy the benefits combined republic . 
. ( i ) i warmly poos report , which the cyprus application of the european union . 
we consumers we but food chain last link , and food in the vilpit and injustice the finally us . 
we particularly important that the european level , it ensure food safety from farm to table specific , table fork band of . 
just therefore , that we really veljellisten and really yhdenveroisten when development all the countries with , we will not guarantee such naamiaisia by voting for the . 
the council informed this parliament before valiokuntaäänestystä but only little before , when it deliberately excluded from to discuss this to me i or parliament with . 
in my report i called for , that ngos representativeness and participation in , that they are more more responsible for parliament , that action programme is annual report for the parliament , that is open as possible action programme , that past knowledge to prejudice in the fight against discrimination and that indeed recognised . 
the is to the workers legitimate interests . 
social partners is päävastuullisina discrimination at work on the questions regulation the best conditions to practical solutions . 
jenny was access charterista , he was the coordinator , and i him article 13 on hearing . 
the practice therefore , that directives and action plans to it , that member states reject the same discrimination and the from that the commission can to role , agreements protected so also social debate in . 
although the current legal basis to appropriations new preparatory measures for , programme of this category could lead to other policies reducing appropriations . 
ladies and gentlemen , we for a framework directive , which is necessary but not sufficient and which we mechanisms is refine the opportunity ago , when it is to apply . 
i hope , that the commission will carefully gender discrimination based on the new directive on the basis of this legislation . 
i congratulate the commission and my colleagues have delivered their opinions report . 
i pleased mann report statement , which vakaumuksellisille organisations to the future cases the to staff , the requirements of this background , . 
mr commissioner , the commission how it quickly institutions are used amsterdam treaty the new powers , shows the european union is still in the area , and i would like to thank the european the commission the right emphatically . 
mr cashman 's report , what respect of various forms of discrimination exist in our societies to the importance of the action programme before us . 
mr president , i would like bonino list for to the bewildered outrage the , which we this way the european union , which the member states and are discrimination , racism and xenophobia to . 
can the commissioner to explain why the commission , ignore this ? 
the second problem is i think it , that ngos , so important as they are , calls for to programme of the size , and by type of action , . 
liberal democrats will be unanimously and had welcome all this , but in particular parliament action , which is wanted to stress and also before all phenomenon prevention and good practice . 
it is challenge us all , because we all condemn the people ensivaikutelman . 
mr president , the fight against discrimination and discrimination against legislation of the recognition of the means , that discrimination is and that it is in many cases ' legal ' , because it is become so normal . 
un : the trade and unctad unctad presented the first in geneva in 1963 kompensoivan inequality , discrimination principle . 
notices and awareness will is in fact this area fundamental importance , the act is the them as a new mentality and of iskostamiseksi , so that people between the prejudice still to to eradicate uprooted and to guarantee to all citizens real equality law the . 
therefore , is important that , in these two now before us is a legislative proposal , although the , is to improve some , and programme to finance for appropriations is to way , which reflects combating discrimination political importance . 
particularly agreement , which concerns sweden and ireland from which reasonable adjustments principle , ensure now , that the european employers the coordinate their judicial policies their jobs , purchase special instruments and change working methods , so that disabled people employees really is fair opportunities . 
article 13 is the eu : the new objective : article , reasons the citizens discrimination or difference in treatment in . 
secondly , i would like to refer to the commission , that is the first package , unfortunately , done a mistake in possible grounds for discrimination priorities . 
mr president , religion of discrimination is cannot accept the more than other forms of discrimination . 
as a convinced ateistina i not this idea . 
the idea noble , that each citizen to the possible freedom , as long as it is the extent yhteismitallinen other people freedom with , is today often obstacles , which others the rely in and others justice . 
the second directive is already adopted in record time , and i hopeful the , that the second is the french presidency in november . 
some are contrary to other legal requirements with , for example komiteajärjestelyjä on amendment no with . 
i it cannot accept amendment no , 38 , which proposes , that article 5 is list of cases , which also of different treatment could be justified . 
you have the important question , which the agreements point . 
we now first again common projects in this action programme . 
that is clear , what maailmanlaajuisemmat rules are , it more effective they are . 
rules 7 article member states to prevent arms ohjautuminen ei-toivottaville the . 
. ( it ) mr president , i muistelevani kaihoisasti the times , when the european parliament and also different groupings that are present and trade unions called think and to a civil one to reduce gradually and when was , as far as to how to civil for products tuotannoksi . 
when takes account of our planet and our continent the current situation cold war , and the balance are weapons of mass destruction , threat , this procedure should irresponsible . 
these weapons is become , in many places the world of the anarchy . 
cfsp : to is kriisientorjuntatoimintaa : the eu borders , and not outside the no a , which could be must puolustuspolitiikkana . 
the aim is to prevent arms exports human rights loukkaaville governments , areas of conflict or military research than any the regions . 
the commission was in close cooperation with member states actively involved in traffic and light weapons on the european union common action . 
the next item is the commission communication european research area . 
pitempiaikaisten practice ; the hanketukien and institutional funding fact , the treaty of perusmuodoltaan of instruments and in particular the use of union participation national programmes in article 169 of the treaty . 
we want to before all measures classification , which depends on the practice . 
say , that you think framework programme is a comprehensive restructuring . 
i i think we need now something a , which can to european research area structure , in other , something more than national programmes the framework programme ; we need structures muokkaavan instrument , which means it , that is adopt different approaches . 
being myself a co-founder on , i it with , that we is to something together , because it is also parliament , the joint research centre and different member states to research institutes . 
it seems , that the commission is quickly european tiedealueen to . 
communication is a whole figure , which is the subject of science , society and citizens . 
greece , ireland and portugal authorities is been contact and these countries is been asked to speed up governments the cohesion fund of with its projects by the commission . 
perhaps you mentioned in the commission has just been exclusively with the cohesion fund , which is no longer unit , there should not allowed havainnollisempien access to information . 
the second question is this : the cohesion fund , there is community aid , the structural funds , alueohjelmat and other . what countries have received the final projects and what programmes have already adopted what country ? 
in 1989 the commission made a new proposal , which was to provide more flexibility . 
i commissioner bolkestein by the commission aspects and i know that the treaties , the prohibits the veloittamasta from foreign companies more than kotimaisilta companies , but in europe should apply honest competition the general law and we should to competition law impact situations , which verotusasteet are fully multilateralism , although general rule is that these things are , of the member states . 
if you want to save fuel , is reduced rates of fuel and other taxes through . 
. ( i ) i would like to say that mr purvis , the location unfavourable role is national governments thing , because of the voters live these peripheral and peripheral regions . 
mr president , mr commissioner , thank you for your information the commission . 
the european commission made last spring and summer general report work and henkilöresursseistaan . 
i have heard such information . 
these children use a growing extent for , and businessmen , which arena often are european . 
the commission believes that all companies can , in time for the introduction of the euro final and also to tietokonejärjestelmänsä and ohjelmistonsa . 
this philosophical political the debate is not timely , but we can no longer perhaps to discuss generally referendum dangers in other context . 
this is also do not hunt elk . 
the french authorities is recently sent reminder . 
. ( i ) i can tell you , that the candidate countries , with is been meetings animal transport and the initial agreements this is achieved . 
the commission but of this year kevätkylvökaudella cases , which the eu to was been such erilajisten traditional plant , also cotton , seed , which spoke of genetically modified signs of a greater . 
i can but his staff to hear to you , that privately or in the workplace in tietokonelaitteiden essential safety standards for is a directive on electronic , pienjännitedirektiivissä , and radio and the directive telepäätelaitteista . 
is he agree with me , that this is the but incorrect to difference jobs security , luokkahuoneen security or at home puuhailevan child safety between ? 
perhaps he pinches president khatami of . 
aung san suu kyi is now actually under house arrest . 
i therefore to go further trade , or would recommend trade or tend to favour the further action . 
question no 15 ( h-0769 / 00 ) : 
they requested to this , including the both electoral and non-electoral , which they were had . 
questions no 16-44 will be replied to in writing . 
we would like accounts since european report , which parliament should published and to . 
we should concentrate on the , that are to produce other than weapons , and the , how we can compete with the other asetuottajamaiden . 
security council five permanent commissioner , which task is to security , should pay attention to these proposals and to what agreement as soon as possible a system , which is really worth of the 21st century . 
the debate today is an important step in the reform process , which prodi the commission started a little more than year ago . 
i can be , that when the commission without the to proposal reform on white paper set deadline , it is concentrated enough detail . 
i therefore propose that financial controller , and that internal auditor to every year report , which to information their work . 
van hulten 's report is quite rightly to the commission clearer expression being promoted by that leave the separation and create ladies and basis exchange of good practice between institutions . 
this is not hopefully to happen again in this context . 
if we something for the institutions , so the committee of independent experts the independence must apply to the line . 
we we experienced earlier very often , how too long decision-making processes are led to application factors for the , that they are to and lost confidence in european bodies to . 
i would like to say the commissioner , that this report is only the . it means , in that it is the first stage , when we bridge the control system and a system , which we want between reform to time . 
this before the proposal concerns . 
only then , when they can to , is the introduced also otanta , valikointi , which are often . 
these are mere words ; we all aware that , that task is certainly not easy . 
i of course , it with , that we as politicians we and technology ammattilaisina cannot solve this problem at all alone . 
fortunately , however , very great majority children and young people is environment , which is not any these problems characteristics . 
i fully agree with the commission president , with the that this constitution remind list is a necessary , and me is quite clear , that the principle of subsidiarity is strengthen and that the eu is not to the policy they many areas , which political problems are not the cross-border . 
information from all over the world and all information sectors will take place very short time home , and one throughout the world is everyday life them . 
they were arrested very quickly , and they said : ' it is funny to police , sarjafilmeissä is is so easily to . 
legislator i this , mr president is not regulated , but it is all between remember , that is all its own rights and responsibilities . 
i particular attention also the arguments , which was education , to talk about equipping to read pictures , young people generations score of providing so , that they are critical of media and are not spending what any , when any and how any . 
a is not be more damaging their orastaville alter concepts that disturb than it , if this document is a must progress or if it is more mobility or if it is even put the movement of obstacles of education , which is in today . 
there the problems are different countries , for example , the different types of social security regulations , apurahoista , right of asylum and taxation are different , and oppiarvoja and -asteita recognised of . 
time is already , that europe attention again to socrates and young people of europe such as programmes proper implementation . 
experience students and teachers movement show , that movement of real master document no so much opetushallinnon , but social , tax and maahantuloviranomaisten areas . 
socrates mentioned this as example . 
we must be clear inspections , clear control , although it would otannan the , and before all a , which students can be valituksiaan . 
we demand that is why researchers in the group of people recommendations . 
it is easy to , but it is more difficult to achieve in practice . 
the debate is closed . 
we pleasant , which will president chirac and foreign minister joschka fischer by the way . 
enlargement requires in ; of again to enlargement and not undermine it . 
last few days seek to re-ignite the west bank , the violence in jerusalem and in gaza raise concern . they are sea , which is the unacceptable slowly edistyvästä of . 
the commission annual reports on motion for a resolution , which you today position , the issue varied . 
this is clearly in the finland on report , which concerns women in decision-making . finland by indicators , can be to the progress . 
commitments made at and equality at work on kollokvion , i would like to mention two important document , which is devoted to exclusively equality , but which are working and social affairs to the council . 
the second is non-discrimination principle , and this includes gender discrimination based on . 
i would like to say reports - the council president on this matter - also that the cultural differences between are of course one of the eu of problems . 
here we are discussing reports give the impression of this . 
we monitor , that is really important directive regarding equality in legislation . 
i believe , that this finland the first time tool for regenerating method is very many areas useful and the part of the commission , tasa-arvostrategiaa it is reason expect much . 
equal opportunities on behalf of the french women were eu : the law to night work , . 
the french as a citizen of this is of me completely unrealistic . 
these comments , vote for report , because we of course equal opportunities , but equal opportunities based on respect for all other before . 
if on the freedom of choice to of their own children , in will for over of youth crime and vandalism form . 
i would remind you in this context , the report which divorce , to pension rights of and which hoped , that the 1979 directive finally in provisions eloonjäävälle spouse to rewarding and eläkkeensaantiin oikeuttavasta concerning the age limit . i remember , that the 1986 ' become a watered down ' directive completed too late . 
polish women were us very grateful for that , we clear , that polish representative in fact tabled polish women position this issue . 
women stronger participation government all levels and all life areas is an essential point , so that democracy can go into and so that peace can be achieved and to . 
finally , i would like to refer to the women in the candidate countries . 
the council , especially the men , is therefore very important in this area to lead to europe in the fight against naiskauppamafiaa . responsibility feel politicians are can to this , it will shrug his shoulders to or be , this slave trade . 
today tarkastelemistamme reports and contributions we can conclude the , which many of us women already no approach to it , , that question equal opportunities is structural problem and that it is to be general strategies , because we women we not a single category or sosiaaliryhmä and nor a community . 
is true , that i was a little regret the , that maria de minister mrs belém roseira not no longer in office in this . 
two of you wanted new social rights and new verotusoikeuksia . 
thirdly , it is perusstrategian the european union , and even charter of fundamental rights important part of presented it fact , that we have description of the situation was . it to also opportunities at national level , so that member states can do comparisons national intentions for . 
the joint debate on is closed . 
these amendments is to new , , which is institutions between agreement , and that is why parliament cannot from these comitology amendments on the side , because they is been in extent of new institutions between framework . 
i itself but i still it with , that parliament recently adopted by text replied much better internal market and market emancipation retaliations and revenge that new conditions , because rejected the amendments , clarify and control to aspects of greater certainty , that the provisions apply and that the on on equal policies . 
if we want , that third countries accept agreements , the european community must be the first vartioimassa jealously guard their its own rules point ; if a country is possible smuggle products , why it community kingdom were to stand to negotiate with us kind of revenge action licences ? 
the way parliament amendment without the paperiasiakirjoja the notifications and the council is adopted it , to the , that member states by can use modern means and continue to automatisoituja hallintovälineitä . 
now is but late , because we voted just and because parliament members voted for amendment . 
vote ( continuation ) 
dybkjær , on behalf women rights and equal opportunities committee ( a5-0198 / 2000 ) the annual reports 1997 , 1998 and 1999 women and men equal opportunities the european union ( com ( 1998 ) , - c5-0106 / 1999 , com ( 1999 ) 106 - c5-0289 / 2000 , com ( 2000 ) 123 - c5-0290 / 2000 - 1999 economic and social committee ( cos ) ) 
. ( fr ) this is not the first time , when i students and teachers movement . 
this report is important in the context , that it appears the european union for critical currently on the eve of enlargement , . 
discrimination is by creating new cannot be to entities , but it can to only and alone by people opinion . 
. ( fr ) i abstained on mann report , because although must to people equal treatment , employment and work , so it is not , however , to so enthusiastically , that forgotten any rights of and respect for the rule of law . 
the form of punishment church kuulumattomana i cannot support this exception . 
scotland , national party - the snp , must welcome this directive and the objective discrimination to end in the workplace . 
so that directive is acceptable and viable , it is must is most eloquent in demanding and toiveajattelulla , which is not nothing to do sermons in legislative texts . 
the eplp is very reservations about the following points but . 
there is also some of which we believe that , should be member states to decide , as directive general implementation , training of certain ikäryhmiin in workers , välitysjärjestelmän nature and it , how small and medium-sized companies should interpreted directive . 
an interview van hulten rightly point out , that we can to positive agenda only ago , when we solved such problems than fraud , of waste and also shortcomings decision-making tuloksellisuudessa and efficiency . 
report on my vote reasons the mainly the question , the european union should be concerned i believe that nato relations , and also the of common defence policy , which is forward . 
also report on european arms exports as a , which will future local conflicts in the european . 
i cannot accept , however , that report in the common defence policy and european security and defence policy within nato . 
. ( el ) children are violence on television was the first victims . 
i very pleased this research . 
the european community level , a group of experts , which task is to general principles report , which in minors protect media the extremely negative . 
dybkjær report ( a5-0198 / 2000 ) 
. ( el ) is particularly interesting , that the political annual reports of is the first time to assessment . 
peru 
mr president , in peru is this now uncertainty time and we all wish to cultivate this , that the current the this situation will be a process , through which guarantee all civil and political rights and which to democracy and peace in and become established in peru , country which 15 : the last year in 25 000 people is received killed . 
now it is word democracy . 
. ( de ) mr president , ladies and gentlemen , in which conditions . elections took place this year in may , is to torjuttavina . 
b5-0793 / 2000 by mrs ainardi and others gue / ngl group , on behalf of the situation in afghanistan women . 
it therefore i it with , that is good , that decision contains some clear and clear points just women situation and that it is attention to , how necessary is that we help , so that we can prevent it , that taliban regime , to its full women discrimination . 
the eu is the fact in this important task . 
no member state is must recognise the taliban power so long as country is human rights insulting policy , particularly women systematic discrimination . 
we is to be this into account european institutions , as it , that huumeviljelmiä used up arms . 
however , the commission will afghanistan to neighbouring countries to , so that the opportunities to improve drugs . 
i think now is a good time to the european union , that is start to plan latin america that they have elected policies , which , to possibly to avoid it , that these countries are at times of major koettelemiksi than in some countries is been . 
. ( de ) mr president , ladies and gentlemen , the commission and parliament that the spanish jesuiittapapin by mr matos castro mention last week 's liberalisation welcome . 
b5-0782 / 2000 haarder the eldr group for macedonia the training and education have mutual benefits universities on law ; 
that is why we all very pleased that , that yliopistotasoista training the problem now finally perhaps to really good solution . 
this is i think before all good example all the neighbouring countries , that education can be through to more than their hatred , as now so often happens , and that education can also measures peaceful multinational society itself as the cradle . 
i would also have liked , that we achieved a solution , which all parliament parties would have accept . 
i may i perhaps in this context , that bring the commission experience cooperation mr max van der stoel 's with have been good . 
we not only to express here . we want to know express our sorrow , what happened , why so happened and how we can to situation , how we can we , the commission and the european parliament , this forward be help so , that such cases in future no . 
mr president , which , we agree with this common resolution . supported it , as it is , urgency , and the reasons i have just the we different with urgently the amendments . 
on amendment no contracts is there to the directive or amendment no wording is not so satisfactory than text is . 
it is simply not acceptable scotland northern and western islands for , and nor possible through the north sea and the european continent between the transport , which i hope for discernible in the near future . 
i am pleased that the greek government , is now removed this derogation . 
that is why the commission , immediately express on safety on the causes , the greek government and asked it to the report , how community law to greece . 
i would like to the this matter and ask you to in the bureau , intend that this should certain parties now , that the also thursday sittings unemployment , when friday sittings is already been . 
i would like also to say , that you the european union is taken the necessary procedures , so that we can to because currently , when people are serbia will respect , because the moment , when mr who voted of government is of the following measures : first power we immediately sanctions and secondly , we economic aid package , which can help serbia people kunnostamaan their again . 
these at belgrade streets perhaps , will be start now democratic change and start it without violence . 
condemn all acts , which can understand hatred purposes , particularly , if the deeds of jerusalem sacred places . 
we shall it is very perhaps be a symbolic hand that the through , as high representative solana said . 
it is shocking aspect in all , that israel police and army used stockpiling of more explosive bullets , which persistent negligence may ruin in and explode on and which are internationally banned even soldiers fighting between , and the was now against civilians . 
i believe , that europe can and must it to this , a much , clearly and effectively . 
we must do everything we can the tulehtuneen situation as soon as possible to resolve . 
provocative towards , as ariel sharon action , not must be . 
the same is arisen again today , and it is just to prevent and prevented europe at all in recent years as in the middle east , to which , to the united states is alone to . 
we will not do serbia people ylevien and moral tavoitteenasettelujemme victims , because it could be even thousands of people death in serbia and yugoslavia . 
mr president , finally , i would like to the proposal , that as soon as possible and immediately when yugoslavia is a new government , parliament delegation travelling on the yugoslavia to the new government with plans new serbia building . 
mr president , ladies and gentlemen , parliament is clear , that we are today parliament possibly historic days . totalitarian dictatorship the last pillars on which rests in europe possibly collapse now . 
mr president , german-speaking , topical things on documents i do not know , is other language versions the same lack of is a problem , that the only in gue / ngl group , but a single motion for a resolution amendments and common texts . 
mr president , i wanted to draw attention to only colleagues paperikasaan , which shows the , which we documents we voted this week in . 
if parliament could do the council decision amendments , it would be croatia unemployment and social problems , which the croatia could laihdutuskuurista , but in this context to amendments is not legal basis . 
now is just the opportunity to , that the european investment bank is on the same objectives . 
mr president , we here last night serbia and there of salute her changes . 
i would like to strongly , to the council , particularly so that they also the next year and it years the next budget on negotiations in the months as possible close to the commission proposal , which is i think still the best assessment of the total cost so croatia than other parts of the balkans . 
country was in 1990 democratic elections , which were international estimates the fair and free . 
therefore ' , ' this economic aid , ' yes ' this conditions , but the compelling requirement the commission support this encourage very european and now really democratically and the rule of law principles in controlled countries and lead to the candidate countries , it because i believe croatia commendable we fully support . 
i , the rapporteur , it will , for certainly now funds available , when it appears that , in serbia also need major capital flows and union budget is considerably increased . 
croatia national parliament and the european parliament delegations by the council to eib : the mandate . 
as kroatiankin case , i hope , that relations creation will soon and that we help serbia people , which deserves what the respect . 
( the approved ) . 
in this spirit we call on therefore the european parliament to the women this delegation the deadline for applications for will take place on tuesday and on wednesday , when the ilmoittautumiset and , delegation of pro-artist names , the it spirit , that we women between rauhansiltoja there , where violence a war is raging . 
all the basque country , and spanish have been suffer more ; spanish and basques are certainly tired of the conflict . 
mr president , you will recall , that the last part-session i question the british democracy for kampanjoivan james mawdsleyn plight , when the authorities in him illegally detained . 
mr president , i to really the rules of procedure . 
actually , this sides technical report , which is apparently to major political changes , is very important , because it is in the opportunity to genetic engineering and end up in this , geenimuunneltuun issues . 
if we now vote this report , development will recession . 
as you said , in the exists is rejected this appeal and it is informed us proper way negative its decision . 
now case conditions once and the was my colleague ppe : in , but it is been political kotikenttäni in italy . 
that is why we hope to , that to the social agenda scoreboard , which is also the internal market , and which the clear measures , deadlines and for . 
mr minister , i hope , that the council must inspiration parliament expectations and that you nice summit to ambitious objectives , which the european socio-political programme on we can ago in the years to cooperation . 
in paris on 8 july the european council informal employment and social policy on the after the asked all the european parliament , operators , of course , economic and social committee , regions committee , the social partners , ngos , the council working groups and committees - to this on proposals . 
is incorrect to the quality and to each other vastakohdiksi , and lisbon was clearly two objectives : more jobs and better jobs . 
this mobility is support for structure . 
we must try to list all the system to them and also to they and which , in the programme . 
open coordination is that the way , if we want to ensure the european social . 
the lisbon imported social efforts on the requires community efforts , action plan to create jobs in particular the information society services in . 
the commission cannot , of course , to this important contribution , but social problems are to have , and the is to so , that is carefully of practical conditions . 
social dimension to was to economic policies turmiollisimpia effects . 
the original proposal was much better without amendments to the commissioner . 
report presented programme is ambitious , and i remember still very difficult , how was to social security the matters last legislative term . 
i think it to also the women family and working life coordination . 
sometimes i feel , that ' production basis are essential ' most whatever that may mean social protection reduction . 
what are the fundamental elements of ? 
is difficult to even even european objectives , but should equally in all member states which , because situations are different . 
committee is become 49 amendments . 
together , that this amendment proposes discussion here every year parliament together with the commission . 
a second report ) the community supports a more new initiatives on the need 's assessment work . support , if necessary , also national legislation to equality and promoting and discrimination to the efforts the . 
in the past is not a good ideas or good plans to achieve equality , but the implementation is often failed . 
is abnormal , that all women speaks for a number of small , which to professionally on demands it , , that them tihkuu public funds . 
women and men is be equal , civil society , women is to be able täysimääräisistä human rights and fundamental freedoms . 
i hope , that also men will finally action and are fighting in the clichés about gender roles and stereotypes on the part against . 
i think we is now thank him for , that he is followed debate , because his presence in this debate also not been agreed . 
competition policy 
we is to our best conditions , so that they can to plan their production and in particular future . 
them must be available broad range of high-quality , securing access for competitive , and this goods is last , the reason why , single market is vigorously forward and together free competition , with because this is all our citizens interests in . 
example the decisions to do it , will kivihiiliteollisuudelle state aid or not . 
riis-jørgensen report 16 point deals with the increased legal certainty , when it is here on applications , and the more effective and faster timetables court vetoamiseksi . 
which , it is public companies , which economic strength is not correct johtamistavasta , but rather previous and the monopoliasemista . 
so that citizens knew what interests , competition policy achieve , citizens in their information is to . 
they are of regional economies and employment for particularly relevant , and i hope , that in future this is clear , so that these aid , internal aid , which the regional development and regional economy , which the example are the to , could continue . 
communication contains three the message . 
i thank sincerely also mr evans his excellent reports , which are all to state aid steel on legislation and the european union of the aid . 
so i would like assure commissioner palacio and karas and other speech these points puuttuneille parliament members , that regulation takes their concerns widely of . 
otherwise we competition and consumer helping the goal refer way . 
the debate is closed . 
rahoitusjärjestelyllä is implemented ec : the treaty article 119 , which is provision in economic and monetary union third stage in the member states only for , which are not involved yhtenäisvaluuttahankkeessa . 
. ( de ) mr president , mr the commissioner , ladies and gentlemen , i thank the , that we was today time to this proposal for a directive amendment of the council vegetative propagation material item of the trade of directive 68 / eec 193 / amending , and i hope , that proposal is adopted tomorrow vote . 
some of them are tabled on 5 july beaunen appeal , which they have a strong concerns gmos the use of the their industry . 
the rules , which these provisions contain , favour , the vegetative propagation material material and to the terveystakeet , which is very important , so that community support can be effectively requalification restructuring , which is a key issue new wine com : in . 
is say hard and clear , that is been at all necessary with this directive articles full reference to directive 90 / 220 , which is review , if ago to all efforts to promote the genetic manipulation in . 
i pleasure to you , is that we can also accept graefe zu baringdorf by amendments , which seeks to 3540 security and hallintavaatimusten the of national legislation directive 90 / 220 in . 
i would like to point out that the only , parliament is not been asked themselves to its position . 
mr president , i refer to the pöytäkirjamme 14 , which the request mr pacheco pereira parliamentary immunity of . 
i am speaking more määräenemmistöasiasta . 
the vote , i would say that two very familiar opportunity is equally in the simple weighting , which is very small majority of or double majority , which is different models , , simple or on double majority or a model of their population . 
it needs , evaluation and yugoslavia federal republic to economic and assistance coordination , which is of the european commission and that the world bank , is not no to the european council decided that , biarritz to yugoslavia federal republic first urgent humanitarian hätäapupaketin , which the 200 million is eur . 
ladies and gentlemen , parliament - but , to you freely and very sincerely diverge markedly from my , i would say that these issues , the commission and the weighting of votes difficulty , nice failure or success is cannot be measured on the basis of this . 
positive was also , that the heads of state and government adopted charter of fundamental rights , but mr president , the council is also , i remind why approval of was possible . 
we must stifle to death nice spirit , and so a priority issue is a key 50 : the remaining is of the negotiations to the political level . 
in this , i would like to address the european people 's party also to my colleagues - and i urge mr poettering to listen to me - because we must defend parliament both inside and outside it , what defend parliament . 
it on the basis of what we know , the government , and what presidents were biarritz , has shown himself capable treaty revision of the issues , charter of fundamental rights will probably nice the victory . 
the council could answer in the european citizens expectations by a peoples and national parliaments consultation , which , should possible to a real needs the charter . 
is therefore urge all to our union source , is therefore be as bold as gentlemen giscard d ' estaing and schmitt were the european parliament election by universal suffrage , directly elected in 1976 and 1979 and is to decide , that in the commission president 2009 we finally is at the same time the european union president . 
i would like this , in particular to the , what mr poettering said about small and large countries between . 
i should only a few by external trade policy , because it is very seriously be subject . 
it is valuable thing , as all participants are pointed out european council . 
the second very positive thing was that , charter of fundamental rights was adopted as a whole . 
also , i feel that this european union and the future päätösmenettelyjen for crucial important question , nowadays was important , and we can only welcome the . 
i hope , that we can still assure others , to and to this matter in nice through . 
i two practical examples : the is not been the right work and to work , and the many social rights , which the european council to social charter , is not involved charter of fundamental rights . 
throughout europe in debates , also biarritz in debates , is become clear , that the member states are aims not to dissuade small member states to the european union member states to the direction and the wishes in . 
both laitojen dissatisfaction is of the , that negotiators are going the right balance towards . 
the european leadership is not formulated clear view . 
the commission , which is to principles , which the individual countries must be represented , is not of far-reaching view . 
this union would centralist , and it would small countries less influence than the united states into a proper two-chamber system to länder . 
the el el-sheikh memorandum summit all parties involved were looking for all , way to violence and critical dialogue to restore barak and arafat between , but the after we saw , that it was extremely difficult , although moment time näyttikin it , that violence to stop . 
obviously bad applied where reporting agents set mr barón crespo untrue to say things italy and my party . 
important progress is european energy taxation , and this , is the principle of unanimity prevented . 
we must things to the point , that small countries are fear the saneluratkaisuihin . 
my opinion , the convention is done excellent work , and i proud of , that i be this convention commissioner . 
in this second question , which is , at a mediterranean tempo this large and small countries between absolutely equal system is . 
it , that qualified majority voting to real issues together with codecision , 250 article of the in form , the commission role and role closer cooperation , and only the first pillar , are , some of points , which , we can immediately to , it is after all , failure or success . 
mr president , first of all thank you , altiero jacques - for opening up spinellille and fernand herman and thank you all once havelista carlo ciampiin , joschka fischer jacques chirac , , michel barnierista , moscoviciin , chris patten costa simitisiin and the thanks official function in florence and for the european parliament existing members , which have in 1999 the european constitution on a project . 
let us should not use too much trade every europe , and this says you socialist : this europe is created prosperity all . 
let this objective , even when we and the , let , how we it . 
mr president , i have to say , that welcome the intergovernmental conference recently the proposals the essential , all or part of i criteria . 
mr president , mr commissioner , the commission ladies and rapporteurs , ladies and gentlemen , parliament you hoped , that a debate this morning the issues , which , parliament is not necessary to last april its intergovernmental conference on opinion . 
so the constitutional framework under i should difficult assume and i say that the procedure parliament advise you consultative opinion as to time more closer cooperation . the world 
as you know , that this requires us to do , of political choices which are of much greater than the requirement to the three . 
i myself stressed that the charter of fundamental rights , laatimismenetelmä was not yet been able . 
however , i was thought , that linguistic six months , your question was another concern . 
this is why i wanted just to thank you , and content that form for , for your initiative . 
closer cooperation implementation is should lead to new bodies of union institutions alongside . 
is time check the treaties . 
european council is this the european consensus in the european union charter of fundamental rights relative treaties , a the the legally binding and , to citizens , which rights is been , access to of court . 
otherwise i think is can be citizens europe . 
8 point : the address - and i quote - ' text des questions laissées ouvertes ' ( questions , which were open ) . 
no one is not yet been able to explain me , which is now changed the times . 
secondly agenda is inadequate , because it is been from union future for particularly important and citizens interesting questions . 
mr minister , history papers are , that bolsevikkien revolution - on the eve of event , which were unfortunate consequences the world - russia ortodoksikirkko was concentrated to discuss paastonajan messupukujen kuosista . 
cooperation must this , to all they guarantees , which the rapporteur is proposed , which are all open and which respect the spirit and work community legislation against . 
however , is one point , which i would like to ephremidis opinion : i is not right , that member states to calls for referendum just the changes of , or that it is even . 
we have had very essential debate two different subject , which is but a common being a genuine interface . 
we prepared to the , that this can be vote november part-session in , so that it could also accept the french presidency in . 
( parliament adopted the resolution ) . 
what means ' the to osaeläkkeelle part-time work within the framework of ' , if it is not threat , which is already eläkeiälle quite too high in country ? 
we know , that the elderly children , are to hilloista . 
i asked to pensioners , which elected me here the european parliament as a member of the pensioners ' party if they drink genetically modified wine . 
exceptionally , can offer lisäysaineistolle standard , when needs is cannot be covers other categories . 
mr president , so i ask you : are also on the issue of fluctuations these reasons not free competition restrictive the european union factor ? 
so our voice could be only against , so as it was . 
, to towards greater regulation the european union dismantling , state aid can still be but constructive social and economic development . 
this support can be necessary to protect the environment , public services to and equal income to guarantee economically weak regions people . 
we it risk , that significant state of the eu : the control of the eu , after the into consideration will also lower level aid as a competition smes . 
section vi , economic and social committee 
when considers the categories 2 , 3 , 4 and 7 of the erääntymissuunnitelmia , finds , that payments cover only average 8 % of all obligations . 
we työllisyysaloitteemme three years ago in a smes to risk capital . 
parliament wants to support two way . 
only then the european union institutions are up informed . 
in this context i would like to thank constructive cooperation in particular for the vice-president , mr gerhard schmid . 
we want , that this committee to effectiveness , but we cannot allow , that there are least the european parliament demands as budgetary authority . 
it means it , that the 2001 budget is the last total annual budget , and it is also the commission proposal background and parliament considering the proposal . 
also we want to administrative expenditure . 
parliament is the committee on budgets since 1985 , - really since 1985 - tried the , that the european parliament procedures to the parliament resolutions adopted by rahoitusvaikutus . 
mr president , i thank finally other institutions common statement for reading . 
you are statement today position , which is budget already been the council at first reading . 
structural measures : structural measures for the same remain as the 2000 budget . 
the council is revision of the financial perspective calmly . 
when we compare these three institutions different figures , we see , that they is still considerable differences , purely of , and of course more significant - . 
i refer to is that the council , the made last year long of debate after new decision on comitology , and the debate opening is little hope . 
berlin to 2006 something across financial perspective of was for ifo , billion eur . 
i would ask the council and the committee on budgets that parliament think things budjettipoliittisen perspective , also foreign policy , then , when they are dealing with foreign policy . 
the second concerns aid of victims , which need special treatment kuntoutuskeskuksissa . 
if now remaining time in to a compromise , which supports economic and monetary affairs committee work , we can to regulate this , otherwise we open our committee position . 
we not need to than television , so we see the difficulties in the middle east and which we reminder of the day . 
that is why i hope , that we vote tomorrow but enough dublin the majority position . 
mr president , i would like to a few comments on behalf of the committee on agriculture and to the sound rural policy . 
we asked , that common fisheries policy on the information campaign to two million euro reference ceilings are appropriations . 
the commission must to negotiations important arguments , so that morocco with to a sensible agreement , and the council and the governments to is to these negotiations politically . 
we today the 2001 budget , images in mind . 
we all , , that these amendments were adopted . 
one important ways , which citizens can to ensure that , in their deals with , is to either ombudsman or parliament . 
i am speaking first parliament budget . 
many our delegation commissioner people 's surprise , we september at the beginning of unanimously a ydinstrategian , and some 400 amendments tabled by my colleagues were surprise many of us the committee on budgets . 
is difficult to see how new posts , a solve hallinto-ongelman , if programmes but is vanhentunein and mutkikkain policies and the commission that the council . 
parliament is shown last years many times , that it to work on real apply thrift as well . 
so is must do , that speaks for years löyhäsuisesti commitments and will always the , but ago when is it payments , says that now this goes too far , we now is to make cuts expenditure . 
we have hopes here by a few millions of much more it is can be these budget lines , and when these people really need money , we they again from . 
the 2001 budget is the last year , the contradictory pressure , which is almost impossible to , namely the pressure stabilisation and säästöpolitiikkaan , as agreed between the institutions enlargement to ensure , and funding on the other hand the balkans to the stability pact . 
demand better performance means also call for more staff . 
if amendment should adopted its original form , we have to appropriations of , but the committee on budgets majority rejected this idea . 
this is unfortunately much examples : always special treatment , which is an unfettered federalist approach promoting organisations or many ngos , which philosophy and action are very questionable , european political parties to until , prince programme hukutettuja sums of money member states citizens to reassure euro benefits currently , when european always danish from the european central bank held until question on the european currency . 
finally , mr heaton-harris quite rightly referred to what the european union many programmes unilateralism . they are citizens usual propaganda speeches story european integration , and all citizens , kustantamana . 
our administrative systems is also reform . we is move a good example . 
strategically very important geographical area , the mediterranean , development been meda is a good example täytäntöönpanovalmiuksien lack of . 
do not forget , that parliament is its own priorities , when of business to or money finding category 4 certain priorities to finance . we did the clear the vote . 
chapter is therefore to . 
thank you very much , mr wynn . 
it means only flexibility , which , in certain policies can forward , even when all are to cannot or not it do not want , and it , which the union member states , the candidate countries also . 
i think austria is not to complain about in , on the contrary . 
regional organisations recommendations and neighbouring countries experience can to help these means in . 
0.2 % colombia landowners in a 32 % country in 1984 . 
the council is comment on this very delicate and painfully question different aspects . 
but extremely complex issues is to be debate about only . 
question no 10 ( h-0722 / 00 ) : 
i therefore do not want to no final answer this difficult question . 
we is only a feeling , which your answer to some extent , the council presidency supports that is not very willing to this issue . 
this tax on is therefore , of course , will be non-existent . 
i i apologise , but this rules of procedure . 
the reason , which , on the right here of is been silent , therefore , that it is we we these things already again explained , and we believe that the same issues is not many time to here chamber and to we precious time . 
also , the when we of transmissible spongiform encephalopathies prevention on the directive , is in june 2000 these diseases , adopted decision risk that the material , to to prevent the outbreak and new guarantee consumers as possible good protection . 
i is not other information than they , which i you already given . 
we are the commission and the council work erika 1 package on and know the very . but this & # x02bc ; in , which both countries and the european union , which is very feel a large ships and which use to a few hours only , and when takes into account , that there is risk , that old cans etc. which existed haaksirikkoutuvat there and are disaster , i would have liked to know - and especially also and sardinia people want to know - whether possible simply to these the , the in the rahtilaivoilta , the bonifacion the through and are you in this ban . 
it is why we must support the commission proposals in principle i think personnel policy of . 
budget is serbia and kosovo for new fresh money . 
mr president , i hope that we can , finally , however , to cut 50 million eur budget line , which is israel and plo : the peace negotiations . 
so the european parliament proposes new measures , which is so much to seek new funding - which is under present circumstances cannot be to , as already know - but to new institutions between commitments , which improve expenditure quality and ensure , that one euro to wasted . 
think of it , that european policy , as where any , , moderates options are sometimes not majority alternatives . 
it is designed rather than manages to complicate further to clarify , and i was disappointed to activity-based budgeting the attitude , which today is the . 
the expenditure activities , may lead to the , however , that budget is seen as a political instrument , which expenditure distribution of reflects clear political priorities . 
find the solution , so that we also next in and the next item happen in this debate it , how find money balkans reconstruction . 
sustainable development in the agricultural sector interested know , that recent in berlin adopted reform of the was to production support for directly income support farmers . 
ladies and gentlemen , budget is , however , always more than mere numbers . 
finally , mr president , is also immoral to cut expenditure agricultural policy , the meda programme and social exclusion , to guarantee funds on the eu 's financial obligations in kosovo and yugoslavia . 
the people are simply serbia must palella and to see hunger this winter . 
on the other hand i would like to express my concern , that the different conceivable options range from is included in the . 
the council is of course say clearly , that is also responsible for many external action of the lack of programmes . 
now we need a solution these subsidies and even greater extent the region on the necessary , the long-term plan . 
i think , that most are prepared to accept the provided , that money to right . 
i agree with the rapporteur rühle with the concerns and explanatory statement , which he mentioned today research and forms of social assistance in the categories . 
two weeks ago we was eu-akt : the parliamentary assembly . 
also , we want that at the same time to community funds research and information for the tobacco growers alternative types of farming to . 
i would like to clear the european union , that northern ireland effects have been so direct and positive than can only imagine . 
in this model rules and procedures to ensure compliance with independent supervisory body and last ultimately judges . 
this to the first time at first reading codecision text , which is a very full of and technical difficulties and which the sector , which is personal freedoms protection for particularly sensitive . 
is very positive , that their its is not combined . 
is generally known , for example , that is , about whether a more than 10 million of almost 1.5 million citizens , that europol competence is constantly , that it brings 15 member states police authorities respective information and that it is only one authority , which is not competence or resources , which it need to carry out its work . 
this , on the commissioner presence opportunity and i say , that i should appropriate to address new technologies of citizens protection , but this also also these technologies introduced , so that could be to the european citizens ability to the european institutions and the be interaction with the . 
amendments 1 , 2 , 4-10 , nos 12 to 40 , 42-54 , 57 , 58 and 60-64 reiterates the council text the points the , which the commission cannot accept . 
this is clear , that the opinion personal data protection on legislative proposals will be very valuable , because it is important contribution to the discussions between institutions legislation . 
the treaty is recognised , that outermost regions economic and social situation is difficult , and it are erityishaitat , which lasting effects of and make combined effects to these regions development . 
it would therefore economic and social progress high employment through . 
i therefore congratulate the rapporteur to , and we very forward the commission proposals legislative development , so that characteristics could soon to the amsterdam treaty article 299 ( 2 ) the in . 
many european some outermost regions are a matkakohde the . 
our regions plummeting while unemployment rises are union highest . 
i am pleased that the committee , adopted a majority amendments , which i was proposed . 
i think is very important , that outermost regions into the european trans-european transport , energy and telekommunikaatioverkkoihin . 
it , that regional policy committee adopted unanimously by margie sudre 's report presented by the european parliament , is of a as its commitments to the most important . 
we can discuss of circumstances and imagine , that when that get the ideal and idyllic version set out - let us it so - situation is reached , these three area and particularly today before us outermost regions is no longer need for other measures . 
this article is certainly possible all , ladies and gentlemen women and , but it to our the - and this is necessary - and i think of improving . 
the proposals in the commission is , of course , cooperation and the regions with member states . 
we know , that these areas is permanent difficulties , and i believe objectively , when takes account of the real growth rate , that they will need permanently regional policy support and specific measures . 
a meeting to to the year 2001 , when in march the proposed programme is the been to . 
president declared the end of the discussion , and i accept it fully . 
i think parliament is good to to the rules , because , as a another mr said , very often is indeed so , that fact that a machine , but are members forget vote , and if the vote to this , new , we should never by the end of the vote . 
i clearly it , what do . 
mr commissioner , the commission is also authority really necessary , that the commission competent services create cooperation and coordination with member states a and effective monitoring system the food chain and that the european union elintarvikelaboratorioiden network and that it is develop coordinated with the commission . 
is avoid double work and scientific research , we need therefore cooperation and national research centres community research centres with . 
we are discussing today white paper , and we is reason to some important principles . 
those procedures is now been , and in our country is a food agency . 
finally , the support , some new amendments , in particular amendments nos 11 to 13 , and 7 to 9 from and we would like free vote amendment no 14 . 
this against background i would like to say first , to guarantee that food safety depends on government by strict control , which is as strong as it part of the . 
we are discussing issue , which is clearly , how do justice and abstained is the debate , which is the european political integration . 
therefore the european food safety authority believe the only scientific tests , so that it is the national elintarvikevirastoihimme . 
if in the in europe today in the nutrients diseases , the see , that the part of the first was again america . 
however , conditions , which under authority can , is to be so , that they not authority fast and effective measures to . 
we should also remind the , as that some me by speakers , in particular mr whitehead and mr gebhardt , already the white paper is much more than just one new union binding regulatory corpus . 
mr president , i am pleased today and i am grateful to the commission , because and it is started better food safety on work , that the rapporteur and the committee on the environment bowisille , public health and consumer policy committee . 
i particularly important amendment no 17 . this amendment says , that consumer organisations is be consulted . 
secondly , food labelling the rules must change balanced and tukkumyyntiä that trade for therefore , that products and the ingredients traceability for labelling offer finally sound information consumers and give to define , to whom responsibility is possible or can be made available in . 
a new legislation is i think not good reaction the legislation should non-compliance . 
on the environment , public health and consumer policy in the vote , we managed to a balance , when annexed to the food on problems and some important references to small and medium-sized companies in different elintarviketottumusten in . 
mr president , i would like other colleagues , to congratulate the rapporteur bowis very constructive and consistent approach this problem . 
mr president , it , and white paper that food safety is not legislative importance , is in any case reduce it double value , which because without other is . 
the rapporteur , and also very many members in parliament , which in one , i have concentrated on safety and it is really regrettable . 
independence and the independence serve best european consumer role . 
this process , i often thought , that we have been fortunate report by the choice . 
mr president , i too i would like to congratulate mr bowis significant efforts to include report all views , and before all the , that he agreed to more general also food importance . 
after all , mr president , finally , political decision-makers are must avoid responsibility . 
the most important is that , the other agencies should respect it , citizens should count on the member states and governments should be willing to accept the conclusions . 
this is i view the food authority , which we need in future . 
is the world health organisation in geneva . 
i will either , that when white paper published , i authority of . 
we must therefore to ensure , that the european union to highest possible food safety standards , but this approach which supports unanimously must also to analyse the economic consequences , which it is profitability , activities concerned sectors . 
the authority are ago the following : independent scientific research , the to , independent control and inspection , rapid alert , but also coordination to restore confidence . 
i can say in passing those speakers , which require local erikoisherkkujen and perinneruokien promoting , that this issue on hygienialainsäädännössä . 
this is the commission easier to balanced proposal , which is as possible very of parliament and all concerned the food safety . 
on the contrary last years in this ongelmakimppu is acted as the driving force , which political , led to the ottawa the signature . 
i can confirm negative position amendments 10 and 19 the coherence , amendment no 29 , and i split vote point , so that the text to be better , because it is i think suffered some interpretation of into some extraordinary stew . 
this is it the first point : the european union , and particularly the commission , is to everything , so that they countries , which are not signed the ottawa convention , do it . 
mr president , ladies and gentlemen , we know all , what consequences landmines use is , although in some cases often suggests report sounding military arguments . 
just parliament took in 1996 first again the horizontal budget line and proper legal basis , so that we should all used as a basis in this important area . 
i can still to this fact : union ability to this objective to without other it , that some member states is still difficult to sign and ratify the . 
to against measures are most effective , when they tailored each situation . 
parliament knows , that the is already quite now too much , and parliament knows , that we also ec : the external aid uudistamisehdotusten , of individual projects to a of and focus on member states in discussions with kokonaisstrategioihin and programmes . 
ngos is a than schemes proliferating , but still about four years in geneva the the united nations first maamiinakonferenssin , and over year the ottawa the entry into force , we must , to that many countries and thousands of people in general in the poorest areas - the world - are still anti-personnel landmines and räjähtämättömistä munitions . 
the commission must improve quality programmes and speed up the implementation . 
i but it with , that if you read yet again , amendments you can see , that the of is some of which you mentioned , which i think it is , tiedostamiskampanjoista , transparency , ngos access to areas , issues , which are in this currently very but which could be more effectively to . 
the rapporteur bonino and the commission commissioner patten are right , that parliament also it and the council is not interfere in administration , and i listened carefully the commission commissioner patten this issue the attention , because he was clearly it with , that we really is not to interfere in . 
mr president , our group is been already the active in all the criteria and measures , which must be and which are production adjournment of top contributor , destruction of , the trade , miinakenttien of compensation , vahingoittuneille awareness and to . 
member states is ago support this process international contexts . 
mines are of course a obstacle countries reconstruction and it , that refugees can return to their . 
the current , it would take - as is earlier been said - much more than 100 years the earth anti-personnel landmines . 
the third of i concrete action , which the proposals we should do and which we should check and to . 
every child , which really bailing out remembers the german mine from the early death from overwork or kauheilta vammoilta in bosnia , in africa or elsewhere , is all our efforts worth . 
is indeed the european union to the member states , as finland , which are not signed agreement , or the , as greece , which are not ratified it . 
ladies and gentlemen , look at finland . 
finally , we hope , that the european common troops future tasks is technical training , in particular , of which is residence in interest to in . 
they not nor does not , that countries , which is the most mines are mainly developing countries , . 
parliament proposals are could be more contrary to the lisbon objectives with . 
mr van lancker wants , that parliament is decision , which the commission proposal to mainly therefore , that the on the other hand to many of regions , which legislation can be applied , and on the other hand will be a number of the european level rights . 
report says , for example , that the luxembourg procedure , which is employment policy , should also to social protection and social exclusion . 
germany , france , the british and in extent the italian such as the member states are all agree with the european union membership of small eastern or southern countries under the rule of oppression . 
we , as the legal reasons , that charter of fundamental rights refers to already now treaty article 6 , because charter of fundamental rights is in the convention could not do official decision it structure , and because it is therefore not legally sustainable . 
new text in the treaties would probably legal confusion . 
the rapporteur also repeat in brussels fashionable the new theory , the european union which is the double legitimacy : it , which is the european parliament from edustamilta citizens , and it , which is from the council edustamilta member states . 
. ( da ) the danish and swedish social democrats have today voted against it oliver duhamel report , which deals with the constitution of the treaties . 
therefore is that the european union crucial , is itself constitution , which is charter of fundamental rights . 
constitution should sense only if , it should real european federal , the united states , the european democratic framework . 
he said us they , as a part of politicians , that context our relations with other countries to the international through . 
. ( i ) i duhamel report interesting and constructive contribution idea , which the treaties the constitution to . 
we have with it , that if the treaties to the and the simplified , citizens should easier to understand the eu 's tasks dimension - and the borders - and procedures these tasks to . 
europe was the amsterdam treaty 1997 agreement until the supranational eturyhmittymä . 
. ( da ) edd group gil-robles gil-delgado vote against the report , which is closer cooperation . 
report expresses namely of quite too a union , which all forms of cooperation should be a institutional within and which they should all be towards supranational state objective . 
is therefore avoid it , that all the economy , and is therefore allow some member states to go forward by developing closer cooperation forms of system . 
the internal market toimintarakenteet have been the 1990s , the success . 
. ( nl ) european cooperation can be useful of cross-border problems to resolve . 
these regions could be a of sustainable development in . 
the european technocrats and judges wanted therefore to meriverojärjestelmän , which is overseas these overseas departments in kuntiemme source of income and which before all the käsityöläisiämme . 
the , france is overseas regions india in and the caribbean . 
it independence is necessary its credibility . 
our vote so far as the european food authority and the future , but it also composition stated our demands the funding and independence . 
secondly , the european food safety authority is be completely independent . 
is necessary to the agricultural and maatalouselintarviketeollisuuden practices , elintarvikehyödykkeiden imports the problems , come forward with a content composition of , dioxins and tuholaismyrkkyjäänteiden at present fixing permissible and food and other additives , and to priority food safety . 
we voted for amendment no 15 , because we very important to protect the european cultural heritage , which is local food production . 
we is not just margins in category . 
it , we would like now also shows 50 % of the budget line and to others 50 % reserve . 
i can say this , that the proposals by is been . 
haug by the committee on budgets report ( parliament adopted the legislative / 2000 ) the european parliament resolution the european court of the budget for 2001 : section iii - the commission ( c5-0300 / 2000 - 1999 / 2190 ( bud ) ) 
mr president , my name is in many countries of this report amendments . 
( parliament adopted the resolution ) . 
real surprise in this budget is external action , which is selfishness and saituus . 
money can to also by the joustavuusväline . 
. ( el ) i voted haug report and , i voted against the proposal for my group , that budget for 2001 were rejected . 
we particularly new a pilot project action , which is stimulate sexual exploitation of children to combat . 
this if which shows how little , this european project drives even politically active citizens . 
in this way 2030 % market should once open private competition . 
because this is not a before the report , i voted against report . 
if unacceptable low national thresholds , which give more aid , the proposed the market phasing-out needs of reducing 5 % citrus , 8.5 % , omenien and pears , and 10 % , trade in fruit and vihannestuotannon , , clear , that will is is no way to of very great fruit and vihannesjalostemääristä , which , all prices fall , products rot and the tuottajayhteenliittymien pakkaamoihin , and farmers is to repackage these houses and fields . 
. ( pt ) i voted for this report , because it is portuguese fruit and hedelmäalan organisations hopes . they are called for the fruit and vegetables on common organisation of the market , because the revision of the national interests the seriously . 
mr johan van hecke 's report ( a5-0296 / 2000 ) 
the problem is it , that all , the environment even and the quality , is being wealth sources and reserves capitalist exploitation and voitonpyynnin of . 
the kyoto protocol was the , that rich countries are ilmansa in it , although they would be limited to tulosluetteloihinsa emissions , which they are helped to reduce elsewhere . 
. ( fr ) the greenhouse effect is the fight against industrialized countries very important task , it is particularly to the third world peoples to , which already pay with their lives for global warming climate consequences . 
the sensible these risks and difference is life knowledge . 
also is support the to carefully endocrine disrupters - suspected perhaps also legislation through . 
consumers and smes are not enough internal market , which is been completed , the introduction of the euro . 
the fact member states are this until obliging banks to keskuspankilleen over 12 500 euro of cross-border payments maksutasetilastoita for . 
of course these companies are the same strict safety requirements and money laundering , . 
we know even cases , which transfers costs cross-border payments are increased euro of after , and it not only small amounts . 
the european central bank could help , namely by payments introduced a european tiedostomuodon and by a european clearingkoodin the international iban-järjestelmän the . 
is essential important , that consumers accept the euro . 
mr president , mr peijs report , which concerns small payments in the internal market , the old the european parliament requirement , which is cross-border transfers of costs in . 
this says peijs report motion for a resolution d ) : cross-border payments the payments damage consumer confidence eur the . 
we therefore is still much to this area , but it politicians resources and means , what we can do , are lower than what we can do this payments sisämarkkina-asialle . 
euromarkkinoita is also in future sisämarkkinoina , and citizen understand , that this area , which are the valuuttariskit and electronic about means of payment will internet-pankkien , still more itself clear , transfer germany munich austria salzburgiin is considerably more than germany within to transfer munich languages . 
these objectives implementation requires us and also you to years work . 
it , we also cross-border transfers of reducing , which peijs report calls for . 
the debate is closed . 
which , good policy seems to it , that is rather priority practice and on an aware of , which company is at the centre , and a system proposal , which is to be brought to avoid pretext and which would only precise statistics , which should in practice impossible to fully . 
i is however , three comments in this programme . 
let us not forget , that the first this sector community action programme was adopted in 1983 , , 17 years ago . 
i also always supported it , that this would be based on effective and practical policy . 
i would say , that they are the economic and innovation kommandoja , they are the front line and very vulnerable to this sector typical risks . 
we must to of the science and management on the results , which was in brussels last week in seville a technology sector forecasts to institute , , , as this meeting , because they monitoring is several common today reflected issues . 
the rapporteur mentions some priorities the european business climate to improve . 
it is excellent , because the european for aid can be to asiasisällöllisesti right , competently and quickly . 
mr president , i too i would like to thank the rapporteur for , montfortia his excellent work . 
' is important to find the right balance and to avoid it situation , that people fail constantly at the expense of others . 
this is not right , and that is why i support this report . 
this is also small businesses on charter idea . 
programme is so , that networks offer these information . 
is clear , that the basic objective of the european union action plan is countries to immigration restraint and union in illegally of their to . 
i particularly the need measures to improve the internal security , european and albania local authorities the dialogue to support the commission and the council and the need for action concrete measures to promote cooperation albania , italy and greece authorities with . 
lack of social , economic and political conditions with total absence or inadequate for and organised crime will massive emigration . 
mr president , in other than mr pack , i itself it with , that is the better , what is more group for albania . 
the problem is cannot of course , but to immediately in the short term it is a world of , which there is a right and safety and which offers opportunities for the future . 
also the people and the support donors , we all , the european and the united states , which give money and to projects , between is gap . 
we is therefore use bilateral agreements , which legally and clearly define work , oleskeluajan , oleskelupaikan , pay , working hours , working conditions and social security , to immigrants could be seen as a resource , which would our countries economy and friendship and cooperation between peoples nationalist aspirations of kylmänsodan instead . 
the very people be integrated . 
priority must not be it , how immigration and pakolaistulvaa restricted , but how can the conditions to improve therefore , that people can remain homes . 
mr president , i also i to , which my colleague dimitrakopoulos said so , that the central albania in , whether they economic , social and internal security on , is help this country to the rule of law , to guarantee citizens safety and to institutions and local authorities . 
i mr liese , it with , that we need asylum and refugee policy on common interest ; hence . 
albania and its programme for the action plan approved in june this year , and it is therefore in the sixth . 
among citizens is then this frustration but also vieraantuneisuutta european legislation to , and we would like to , ourselves , so also other community bodies , be vieroksumatta in this respect detailed work for the , to work precisely and to this for the also the necessary for and the necessary labour . 
we want to send this report citizens message , that we seriously the demands lack of quality and the complaints ylikansallistumista and concentration on complaints . 
this is of course quite important subject , although so is next , could in this plenary to say , when the how little members here is here to discuss the still . 
also - and this is important - report on subsidiarity , which is parliament this evening very controversial subject . 
should also very interesting to the commission this principle on the legislation , so that a legislation to do simpler , more transparent , more effective and then by additional legislation , as report 6 ) is . 
safety report very seriously , i came to result , that it not even political principle : it is theological principle . 
the principle of subsidiarity recognition guarantee therefore also smaller of , the services , indirect levels , social levels , families and citizens , which are the only for real objective legislative and administrative in . 
i would like therefore to a summary . 
mr commissioner , you is the commission the floor . 
we should choose this area detailed regulation , which is certainly implemented throughout , or should we consider alternatively , voluntary agreement , which , however , to be implemented and which could be to ? 
. ( de ) i voted report for , although i fail to receive a through a few amendments , because the report also calculation and we the too high costs in the euro zone . 
when 15 months after the same coins and notes is also to the 11 member states , the money is a more expensive outside the country of residence . 
mr president , mr the commissioner , ladies and gentlemen , i begin by apologising , is that fishing for the commission commissioner fischler cannot be here present today . 
the is promote fisheries cooperation and morocco , but the fisheries sector is also satisfy fully european fishing fleets the interests . 
we therefore reached agreement , that the work responsible partnership spirit , and this after morocco to views meeting , which is , as you , in brussels on 30 october , on monday . 
i was a few weeks ago the spanish south coast in tangier . it is in close to morocco . 
later time seemed , that difficult , they could be also impossible . 
fisheries agreements under union cannot to fishing and to third countries with fishing rights . 
i read a swedish fishing on ammattilehdestä , how one of those ships to catch fish el aaiúniin , which describes the marokkolainen port . 
all this is test . morocco is only with been , but all our fisheries agreements because the is , for example , been mauritania and soon also guinea with the question now . 
took 11 months to the turning point , which we now , and in this respect , we can also appreciates the commission commissioner fischler latest measures , which are his morocco on 26 october the sea and the level meetings even itself with the result . 
i would like , however , the commission to which the commission , mr busquin today represents a brave decision of a few very short , message . 
the commission question is this : if agreement with morocco is to time , or if that agreement are the commission reservations on the part conditions , , it will moroccan extraction , who production for agreement , will the commission to take structural measures to the regression , which will suffer to which areas ? 
quite as kuvittelimmekin , negotiations with morocco authorities is been very great difficulties . 
finally , the provided in the unfortunate case , that negotiations fail , union is political and moral duty to support owners and fishermen , which guarantee industry to . 
the eu is to reduce the fishing industry over-capacity . 
we therefore need quickly as possible close economic and political relations morocco ajaen the european fisheries of interests . 
this is why the commission working on a new basis partnership , which is both parties which development , and which is the morocco fisheries , fleet , aquaculture , colleges of research and development of a comprehensive and the fishing opportunities to european fishermen . 
foreign languages assistants rights 
' this is not clear difference exclusively in germany . 
in july 1999 , the commission took this infringement proceedings of the court of justice to . 
if so systems is one buying - what we hope - the principle of subsidiarity compliance with this is currently allow it , that promote discrimination , something a , which probably much is it to to privilege . 
we can perhaps to , that the previous santer the commission is the best possible , the commission been so it was to resign . 
all union member states and all parties represent the committee on legal affairs and the internal market members are met here to saying , that is unnecessary to rights and to defend needed charters , then , when if people denied their rights , effective action taken these rights recognise and inspections , monitoring frequency , and this is just the problem in this case . 
this is in any way cannot be accept in europe today . 
the education sector is of course still subsidiarity , but the agreements the free movement of workers and discrimination are us all , although we - and i particularly , because i come from very federatiivisesta country - the european union are the principle of subsidiarity cooperation järjestysperiaatteena and we the , that toimivaltajaot different levels between in europe will take place as soon as possible in the principle of subsidiarity . 
this is why it is can be no longer discrimination . 
the you to yourself , mr president , someone a , which is excellent kirurgiset terms in italian , in english , french or german , or kirurgin ? 
( the sitting was closed at 10.56. ) 
we them to deep sympathy . 
i speak now mr delude ourselves , which speaks on behalf of the socialist group and as rapporteur . 
the council is announced the third asia and the european council and the commission meeting on statements , that it not so far to statement subject . 
so this issue is treaties and the euratom treaty under the competence ; it is or can to many citizens and only the spanish citizens , because in that area , the spanish aurinkorannikolla - which is not no contingency plan for hundreds of thousands of european citizens - is union 15 member states the many people , which will , there union from outside . 
mr president , is sad but revealing to hear the spanish interior minister affair and mr oreja , say that basque nationalist with is unnecessary to discuss , although in future the a new cease-fire . 
i would ask , that this week the commission if we statement , which concerns the uk government the decision to introduce ei-brittiläisiä freight drivers discriminatory tax . 
because so so-called liberaalipuolueet , also european , are still more coalition xenophobia , racism and authoritarianism was warmongering forces with , i this is not only a risk italy but it is something , which concerns the europe . 
report but also for the french proposal . 
these requests is the karamanou report amendments 2 and 4 . 
today 's reading the french presidency is , the initiative to is to improve both the matter in criminal matters to mutual legal assistance in particular in the fight against money laundering on conventions . 
i can say to the fight against money laundering , if that is the council , it is and parliament reason . 
we can only be grateful them this work . 
as mr marinho says - and i myself agree with the way - is , of course , the community framework in . 
all , which are spoken here , have been as with the , that it is very useful initiative , and we support the message . 
we must give europol jurisdiction to countries borders over . 
a happens quite too much today 's europe , and before than i am to support a säntäämistä judgements mutual recognition , i would like , that all recognise fair core standards . 
i understand , that this is very difficult , because we in this move is of fragmented instruments basis . 
this objective of the european union is also necessary to strengthen economic area , what also citizens want . a responsibility to them , and we we actions the european union citizens is right to safety . 
we the european union is continue sisukasta fight against money laundering and be , in particular , that the single market creation and capital markets and financial services liberalisation , member states is to real police and oikeusyhteistyöhön , which is effective as possible be . 
a is justify otaksumaan , that rahoitusneuvojana a lawyer to conduct their profession . 
i would like also to my aware of the how sensitive , is several members by the question , which lawyer confidentiality conditions could be argument to combat money laundering oikeusyhteistyöstä . 
this applies particularly serious , carried out gross violations of cross-border crimes and . 
all , do is so broad and important , that the council be able to the alone . 
this need and the following to civil rights effective instrument , that the european court of recognises the need powers in particular what will the tulkintaoikeuteen and powers to or be without decisions . 
this , although i support , cooperation and coordination , so the legal system of should i think mistake , and i am it . 
the second point is also interesting . 
it is positive , and it is therefore gratifying , that parliament supports this idea so strongly . 
because many members have taken the very difficult questions , i now take this opportunity to say you fully honestly , as also mr coelho made time ago , that this initiative is that the first initiative , which shows the council political will to to it distance , which to legal cooperation . police cooperation 
that is why i think it is also important instrument to guarantee europol judicial control . 
fair-ohjelma , which was fishing , agriculture and agri-foodstuff sectors for research , was part of fourth framework programme , which was in recent years 19941998 . 
when the , how great importance tutkimusohjelmalla is agriculture and fishing , is embarrassing , that research programme administration is been problems . 
the court of auditors report fair-ohjelmasta , which the rapporteur report based on , will be published in march this year only , although audit on sektorikirjeet to the commission in december 1998 and in february 1999 . 
i would like to stress a few points on behalf of the committee on fisheries . 
i grateful that you have stressed , the people , which the report in there was the court of auditors and the commission services between dialogue , which you have own contribution . 
this proves that the commission , not been on and that it is your remarks . 
i am speaking to mr morgan the resources to pass . 
thank you very much , mr the commissioner . 
prize to of thirty-nine-year-old ya -yhdistykselle december part-session . 
i very convinced , that the charter of fundamental rights means , although the many and hallituksenpäämiehet are do not want it to , also this parliament so often and so the by a constitutional process to . 
i very pleased , that brings me today to discuss with the european union charter of fundamental rights of fine proposal , as you before parliament final opinion this text . 
i have no doubt at all , in that it should take . 
however , is true , that the charter of fundamental rights content is in a of criticism . 
this is i think important position , and i welcome the . 
we parliament we achieved a success , when - and this , political groups , which is considered as a positive result , we clearly unable to make through the , that the european parliament was represented 16 commissioner in this charter of fundamental rights in the convention . 
before the charter is i think very successful work , and it can be , as one great european newspaper the appointed on 26 september 2000 , the european visiting card . 
my group is still with it , that the treaty 6 to article 2 is quite absolutely include reference to charter of fundamental rights . 
many hoped , that europe should finally the to just a free trade and for a liberal the citizens of the european basis . 
in december in nice european council in civil society is decided mobilisoitua to make its voice heard and to desire charter of fundamental rights , which guarantees the european citizens real guarantees . 
this is why is important , that signatures , all countries and all political forces will concrete political measures days in future , which day . 
itketään therefore or is welcome , reality this great event , which is all , a empty event . 
the convention is done excellent work . 
the the human rights and civil rights , but also social rights . 
one of the most important progress is right good administration , which mr malmströmkin spoke . 
i not yet heard of them , so i am sure , not yet how far prime minister blair dogs talutushihnaa löysätään , so that could be to this excellent project for . 
mentioned the used for , which is half empty or half full . 
but cologne european council , which made excellent confusion on every continent , the convention was finally all forget , that this issue is national parliaments competence and that these power is but current trends seem gradually . 
fundamental rights excessive protection is as harmful as lack of protection . 
when will some members speeches , see , that we need more information than never . 
a question , which now to us , is charter of fundamental rights to . 
we have this , once again disappointed and dissatisfied . vote , charter of fundamental rights for , but ache . the re-opening , this is that must time the enthusiasm and participation in europe do not want citizens among , and as usual governments some governments others more are historic responsibility this position . 
co-rapporteur duff , this is important step towards the european union integration improving quality . 
i commend , that they , which , it is necessary , read sitting 49 explanations and are also to both courts in , which is the charter of fundamental rights . 
mr president , i long been epäilijöihin . 
the first time the european union after this is the basis for supranational structure , constitution as union is . 
a supports social and democratic europe , citizens europe . 
perusoikeuskirjaluonnos can so far to interesting keskusteluasiakirjana parties , trade unions , environmental organisations , churches and many other delegations in the candidate countries union member states and , when the european peoples future cooperation . 
i would like to highlight three points , which my colleague have already discussed this morning . 
charter of fundamental rights , which today we are accept , and to clarify that the common fundamental rights and values forming europe 's , which is be our community basis . 
i naturally want to , which the 6 to article charter of fundamental rights and to the later treaties . 
we already have seen bernard share my concern about the court of first instance , which the first prevented his critical of the commission on its . 
this summary is important now , when union must define rights and obligations in the third countries citizens legal role the european union , which are legally . 
i itself his way fully convinced that , that will be because direct effects and that it will still binding . 
i have heard in this debate some words : charter of fundamental rights is sharp so-called dog luuksi - the european parliament is and a - or suojapeite kituliaan the french presidency excuse , particularly igc : the management . 
this is why the european parliament is proposed , that the european and turkey between a forum , which are currently one turkish society qualified representatives and this mandate of european parliamentarians to the questions of this . 
consensus is not it , that we all we welcome democracy in turkey and turkey , respect human rights ; we we not . 
i know , , that turkey 's is still much questions . 
presidency hopes , that proposal is adopted quickly , if possible , so already 20 november , when the next general affairs meets the council , and , as i said already , respect for the very precise in helsinki decisions . 
must , however , true , what the commission is said edistyskertomuksessaan very clearly , that turkey is all other candidate countries , meet the copenhagen criteria accession process in . 
president sezar said turkey parliament last month of speech very clearly , why turkey themselves is not no alternative this uudistuskurssille . 
thank you for your attention . 
also it was there a few positive messages to put it mildly . 
we are companies , which some are quite suspicious , to report achieved managed balance . we are particularly the amendments , which is intended to the european parliament past justice . 
it is completely uncontroversial issue , and as it , that turkey must civilised society , to past , although it should been how terrible . 
turkey membership with a and only the united states or nato place for geostrategic issues of , would the european union enrichment and important step towards a united europe . 
is no longer think , that only a small will turkey is europe ? 
therefore vote against this report , as we have voted against all reports , which are set ourselves the integration of the european union turkey . 
damage is before all then , if in turkey visit the on hopes , which is political situation , however , cannot be to . 
langenhagen by the committee on budgetary control report ( a5-0310 / 2000 ) the court of auditors report no 9 / 99 agricultural and fisheries research the measures ( fair-ohjelma , ' fishing , agriculture and agri-foodstuff sector research ' ) and the commission answers ( c5-0227 / 2000 - 2000 / 2133 ( cos ) ) 
. ( i ) i welcome this report and i am voting for it . 
the instead , that charter of fundamental rights would increase human rights and social rights , it facilitate measures , which the reduce . 
is not doubt , that the final destination is a precedent future european constitution , which , in turn is the eu quick road to the summit , when legally decisions is few strong by and all by the implemented . main objective is the european union monopolipääomien interests it workers and in general , peoples interests at the expense of . 
example is 2 ( 2 point : ' anyone is must condemn death and executed . 
in any despite our requests , not to mention , that family is a man and women , which increase the children , and that family is society unit . 
because these judges is not elected elected , this represents a democratic administration . 
certainly i wanted , that it should included in the european treaties directly . 
i abstained on the final vote , but because i think some social rights is in less clearly than economic rights . 
the convention original idea was to agreement of text , which 15 member states governments could change by the treaties binding . 
in the fight against social exclusion is been aid level it instead , that should obliged employers and state to respect fundamental rights binding . 
i , for convinced , that my secular is such a system and modern value . 
it is also ownership social binding nature of . 
this document is clearly not legally binding document , because it is not was . 
the irish government members have recently taken the questions the , might brussels irish identity and prime minister ahern , at the same time when he confirmed the irish eu membership is fundamental important ireland prosperity and economic success , opposed to all rapid changes towards liittovaltiomaisempaa - more dirigiste form of - europe , because it going much further than the part of european hopes or which european are prepared to accept . 
guess which won ? 
i note in passing , that this part-session seven report based on national initiatives , which is , that this system is very profitable there , where it is . 
these good mean measures are necessary , if to combat this phenomenon , which is constantly enlarged and kansainvälistynyt . 
this initiative presidency france proposes to do framework decision approximation of criminal law and money laundering the procedures ( , responsible specifically for detection , jäädytystä and seizure for ) . 
all member states is be treated rahapesua a crime , which must at least four years imprisoned . 
because money laundering is enormous amounts money throughout the world , is clear , that europol is to be power , it tähtäimenä european strategy of police cooperation and legal cooperation for . 
. ( i ) i welcome mr here the french initiative on the second report , which concerns judicial cooperation in the to ensure , that no obstacles is not of criminals , which suspected of money laundering or other similar crimes , which is illegal funds . 
mr president , this is the only report , which i voted against . 
it should the first member state , which geographically to bridging asia and which is mainly muslimiperinteet . 
it is particularly it phase , when we gradually more more eib : the resources , but we but fully covered by packages that we have economic risks . 
i 22 ) , that turkey perusjohtopäätöstä is not the copenhagen criteria , and many sentences , which turkey is received efforts and notify human rights , democratic freedoms and international of areas , and the european parliament similar recommendations turkey , that it equipped the european values . 
mr president , it concerns us , that turkey authorities and of the press is now not along these lines , but rather encouraging rohkaisuja press is to vastakkaisesti . 
nicosia is today , 11 years berlin wall wall after the european , the only been distributed capital . 
the progress is not yet been achieved enough , and turkey is continue efforts . 
mr president , mr council president , mr the commissioner , ladies and gentlemen , i would like to this debate cyprus on the report as . 
mr president , we we cannot accept morillon report , because the statements , we sure , that the accession process is improve peoples life - so as many want - but also in turkey is on the contrary . 
i but at the same time it with that situation , not paint too black of . 
it is therefore , there internal link . 
euro-välimeri-konferenssit in marseilles 
mr brok , which is now been we asked a large number , the negotiations the delays . 
we european is experience , which we can to . 
actually no longer is not essential , as in 1995 , only to relations with eastern europe , but we must also prepare union future enlargement . 
muukalaispelko , state by terror or other terror species of this area , and i hope , that also in this respect things is possible to order . 
this is fact , which we is unfortunately to live with . 
this is , however , we also be honest . 
all this is sign it , that this by achieved results arrangements makes them awareness , although i think answers are not yet situation level ; however , is admit , that five years is not so complex processes for much . 
this is why i believe , that our debate today can help us to understand , how the this policy is the european union . 
it is not needs between competition , but we must find new resources . 
in the middle east spiral of violence and violent and determined war the palestinian people - israel to it still law to country - threaten the the future . 
mr president , quite as the european union is find a balance in nice deepening and enlargement , it should create between in marseilles balanced relationship from the perspective of its and mediterranean area between the responsibility . 
in recent days can be done in many tilinpäätöksissä , which the barcelona process five years , but is it idea that we can be welcome , only already process continuity and the , that is ministerial meetings in israel , the palestinian authority , syria , lebanon and representatives . this is perhaps pays lip . 
the european and mediterranean area is now much common problems : illegal immigration , poverty , foreign debt , human rights , drought and terrorism , which is by innocent people and family life , which we - sad , - have seen in spain , in algeria or in the middle east . 
we prepared to believe them , but the countries need more than promises and speeches : we must give to what , they need . 
europe is not been any aavikoitumis- and water mediterranean the countries , and is important to a mediterranean the environmental policy , which would the mediterranean region , it characteristics and the climate diversity . 
the proposals this balance is much better involved . 
ago kosovo agency . 
we must disappoint their expectations , and those countries need help now more than never . 
i will , by saying that - i repeat the words the commission - these are the cornerstone of two proposal process , which at the end of these countries , which is been and is still much problems , can integrated fully european structures . 
we focus is a responsibility in future , also , if you agency for reconstruction of so you want , so that really is one person responsible for it body , which chooses these individual programmes . 
i thank therefore all colleagues , which are have this objective important , and i also welcome the , that we can to continue these countries more also content in this area . 
i read some bosnia elections on news , that äärinationalistit are won bosnia and herzegovina parliament . 
as you know , the european union is in determined these historic events to support . 
the westendorp and lagendijk reports draft regulations , with , which the second the framework programme and the second european agency for reconstruction , we its support to the union , which will to the western balkans region stabilisation and association process to support . 
so to long-awaited democracy victory in croatia and the after the european union yugoslavia germany , oblige as we know , to yet more . 
question time ( council ) 
the following questions on together , because they agree on subject : 
parties is been new four months deadline - resolution 1324 - which in seeks to achieve editystä these both areas . 
i would like to ask you morocco with the association agreement situation . 
. ( fr ) the stability and development are the european union one strategic priorities . 
what will discussions with turkey , we have just had this subject important debate , and you know , which are very union positions this issue . 
i would like only , that minister stress the proposed legislation , that it is for them , which use of and benefit from dire straits the people and not for it to immigrants or possible immigrants any more this . 
we need and legislation that practical to debate and to increase awareness . 
. ( fr ) i believe , that these crimes must to all possible means , absolutely all means , and i , so that the council of ministers union than the united nations general assembly , and , i believe this , also turkey government are prepared this . 
14 other member states took otherwise measures is therefore , that they are have the . 
i you example : if my country in france - and i am speaking now minister - in tomorrow power being predominantly right-wing extremist party , i would like , that my country to similar measures as the austria . 
in i wanted to values : i inspires the values , i charter of fundamental rights and the values i , including - really - any fight against discrimination , which is all european texts at the heart of the . we must respect for control . 
i would remind , that this political dialogue is the accession partnership - with - of the pre-accession strategy turkey , which defined in helsinki . 
question no 12 ( h-0850 / 00 ) : 
this we are , and we will to follow this line , and no other . 
this is to say , that marokkolainen side is answered community offer . 
these citizens will scotland , which 110 of being after person is either be prosecution or be released , and him must no longer never again to that crime . 
is taken concrete action , for example , hankintavarmuus ( and energy efficiency ) , so that member states economies are react so sensitive outside the future crises ? what are the council the instruments available and short and medium long-term priorities objectives effective use of energy and energiasäästöjen to achieve ? 
union position the united states legislation the extension of the measures outside is not changed . 
finally , i , that the european union concern the united nations agencies and programmes representatives on the ground by observations and that is why the union regrets the united states embargo negative and often dramatic consequences cuba population . 
is the council therefore understand , that problem is fully political , and that not acceptable to agree and - and that vainoajaan ? 
on the other hand this agency to the commission on the other hand , the hallinnointityöstä hajauttamispäätöstä is been excellent results . 
they are not no borders . we reject the cross-border crime is , are they ago drug trafficking , the cross-border criminal cooperation or trafficking in human beings in . 
should a good , if the commission commissioner patten , which is a experience - and perhaps viisauttakin - international crises in and which is visited different parts of the balkans , to agency for reconstruction päätoimintapaikkaan in thessaloniki to , how this agency is . 
but this is not the european myrskyisin area never been so full of hope than now . 
i would like to thank all before parliament the excellent work and the these two draft regulation in research . 
we have quickly results also in serbia , which the commission over four weeks is produced a total of eur 200 million hätäapuohjelman . 
we can , of course , accept the proposal , that the commission adopted by guidelines is reflect it to better efficiency , which to push ahead with our . 
i hope , that parliament understand may i proposals sagacity and to work constructively other with this very difficult this on , but i can support parliament amendments , which is unanimity . this should college position against . 
the third challenge in seoul asem summit was deepening and hallituskumppaneita for that for citizens . 
this of people between in principle throughout the asem process opening up possibility of civil society , although ngos initiative social forum is a could to , because certain asians partners opposed it . 
in we very happy that we , summit was in seoul and that all governments were there as heads of state or two , from . 
is adopted even two specific proposal the round table meeting globalisation and duo-vaihto-ohjelma , which is 4 300 partnership , which is the value 25 million dollars . 
the commission communication to to community and member states the competence of these points organisations in pollution resulting from a can be done . 
if we the the , that all the rannikkovaltioista only few is the economic , legal , legislative and political opportunities than the european union , understand , where extent we ask ourselves is , which is responsibility . 
common fisheries policy reform is a important , but real reforms to is still more important . 
hardly no farmed fish is an integral movement . 
we know the european union and very far from the borders both inside and outside . 
mr president , ladies and gentlemen , first i would like parliament to thank you support we in to and also to community action regional fisheries organisations . 
so far is , have already achieved some progress , but in this , is to before all a better framework planning . 
plants in the production is really led to already supply growth , and if growth to tuotantovälineen unlimited in , the would once inevitable market balance are serious . 
it is rather than more sensible , that every sianlihantuottaja is own evil of vararahastonsa . therefore each sianlihantuottajalle a säästöpossu . 
it states , that is also important support producers ' organisations , which number of varies between member states much . 
market organisation as they are acted as this , are rather served as prevented keskittymisprosessia . 
economic globalisation is in this case a fearsome trap , and because not at all nothing to do with the kausivaihteluihin crises . 
all farmers which the union can join this system . 
mr president , mr commissioner , the commission report the rapporteur garot is dealt with properly and the very this the commission proposal sikatalouden rahastoiksi . 
it is balance . 
in this respect , i must say , however , that i become different conclusion as mr garot and that i can also accept almost - i can almost say so - the commission proposal , as it is before us , but also to honest , it is in practice not really no solutions . 
ago piglets to increase specialist farmers in the proposed system amendments 7 and 13 in form . 
' what the commission is ago us proposed ? 
firstly , the analysis of the specific budget lines , the implementation . 
the court of auditors to therefore previous years comments negative effects , for example kehnoista and hätäisistä decisions , workload of errors risk and so still . 
last the dramatic events are clearly shown that , management and control the questions are still more important union agenda . 
this are economically tunnollisia member states and rewards less tunnollisia member states . 
in this context i would like to mention briefly to the external aid , that improving the commission is as a whole work priority and the the administrative restructuring that it therefore , that the outstanding appropriations is to korjaantumaan than more effectively and more quickly . 
now the european parliament is very difficult situation , because it assured still in january this year , that it no longer accept it , that to the 1999 tileihinkin is serious mistakes . 
i would like to the problems some , and i hope , that the court of auditors president karlsson could to my questions today . 
we is be more figures , and we is be more tangible results . 
i will try to the work already this year , so that we can to directorates-general assessment . 
we all know of course , that the commission will work changes on . 
this reduce the number of errors . 
that is why the commission is now and in future to rules on . 
i should like to quite firstly the court of auditors president karlsson for introducing the , that cooperation with the committee on budgetary control is this in been much better than in previous years . 
i urge you to publish also towards the bottom of , which is , where countries is been eu : the member states most administrative irregularities and which areas . 
mr president , i too i would like to thank for the court of auditors annual report and the court of auditors political assessment yesterday the committee on budgetary control . the highlighted again reform has been taken and the need . 
this is also it , mr van der laan what earlier said and the we fully as with . 
this can requires that the court of auditors , president to the court of auditors this power and viestintätapoja on decision-making . 
taxes vary different member states , and they are different in different member states . 
of common agricultural policy on work , arable crops on report , the court was the result that , in community budget from 1993 to 1997 was paid over eur 13 billion more than should been sensible . 
do not have any me questions , which is impossible to . 
also the court of auditors is change its procedures . 
always is something , what can be pleased . 
this report was adopted in committee by a majority on the environment parliament , and this , i this the vote result . 
the second point concerns time ago so help support the much-praised ban . 
that is why i this amendment no very restraint and torjuisin to this provision . 
second or third reading need those the 314 votes , and we certainly must if the report will this . 
the commission is taken cautiously but positive step this direction , and perhaps the commissioner speaks this more in his reply . 
we agree with the rapporteur with the , when he is stressed risks and transparency information consumers in particular health and safety areas . 
i think is better to the principle of subsidiarity into account . 
i remember but important debate , which i was my daughter elisabetta , when he with yhdeksänvuotiaana asked permission to the alone . 
should ensure , that guarantee complete consumer protection simply leaving it unregulated issues but many times or even possibly contradictory manner . 
i would like to emphasise the committee on the environment adopted by the amendments , which improve the transparency and the consumer is not only producers also distributors responsibility cases , which dangerous amendments products is draw from the market . 
this means also , that when a new sectoral legislation , it is this directive the provisions before . 
many amendments improve the report , and text the commission cannot accept this , they . 
thirdly : amendment no 4 proposes that , however , that member states in duty is to very justified reports cooperation competent and independent public or private bodies with . 
although the commission support cooperation and common principles , proposed wording is the principle of subsidiarity against . 
the commission is not informed the wording of problems , and changes would provisions . 
amendments 39 and 44 proposes , that dangerous products on information should be generally available only citizens ago , when kielto- or takaisinsaantipäätös is been , and that market are authorities are could to confidentiality requirements of the information . 
mr martelli , normally you the floor to only after votes , but i you exceptionally short the floor . 
eriksson , on behalf women rights and equal opportunities committee report ( a5-0294 / 2000 ) proposal the council decision gender equality on community puitestrategiaan 2001-2005 ) ( the programme ( com ( 2000 ) the - c5-0386 / 2000 - 2000 / b5-0143 ( cns ) ) 
mr president , my question concerns the 10 , the genocide of amendments voting . 
( parliament adopted the resolution ) . 
responsibility is double the it is union countries , governments but also mediterranean partner governments . 
this aid is tragedy , more than justified . 
women night work ban was one of the few points , which for some countries women ' social legislation was a little more progressive other men and women 's for that . 
i hope very much hope , that the commission will in future in time and every year of the budget , erittelyllä that the european parliament can to and to things more . 
i unfortunately voted against report . 
is important , that products are safe , but we should go much . 
this , the european agency for reconstruction in kosovo will on that board , and it from member states and the commission representatives is each one vote , and decisions is a two-thirds majority two . 
serbia algerian-ongelma is i think kosovo . 
. ( da ) the danish social democrats are opposed report , which aim is to introduce by saying that specialist to support the eu in . 
unfortunately , we know that , although the france is lämmennyt a little about it , the commission rejects these proposals , and the council seem be the adoption of the majority . 
small but also of is by itself . 
mr president , affecting christian syrians been genocide began immanent justice twentieth century , which cannot be excluded from the process ' . 
because sweden is not prepared to common military defence , but , civilian crisis management , we cannot support 15 points , which the ' turkey government request to the way or another common foreign and security policy development ' is positive . 
it also , that all democracies is demand muistamista all european know , that it is difficult and painful , even so difficult , that the european some countries are not managed it is important , such barbaric acts that are no longer be repeated never , deeds , which is destroyed ethnic , religious or cultural reasons other people life and which are iskostuneet the attention of the world . 
this is without other it other than today debate , but because i turkey question i wanted to say so important , it the today . 
because people is no longer prevent use sovereignty , peace is now there possible . 
i voted today for the amendments , which called for this , so that these certificates to continuation and one nation tuskat as . 
genocide happened monasteries empire in . 
jové peres report is not only to this general practice the and the regional organisations , which is in , but it is to this practice so , that the commission , the to aid from different member states , the experts . 
is very clear , that point are in today 's debate , which is with the european community regional fisheries organisations representation , but they are also very as the negotiations , which is , for example , the world trade organisation . 
my report on the council supported the president colleagues trittin and the european commission , so the european parliament decision three directive reunification is faced much resistance . 
i one example : 0.7 % pvc is scorched earth total waste . 
mr president , i by saying , that ppe / european people 's party is pleased to , what is been a this third reading in . 
mr president , i too i would like to thank blokland this important matter preparation . 
waste incineration is not recycling . 
now third reading become parliament commissioner blokland report was many parliament the first time to the committee on the environment commissioner , the first tosikoitos which the parliament practices opeteltiin . 
new cement kilns for is been introduced stricter limit values as rinnakkaispolttojätteelle , as mr evans pointed out . 
although the situation member states varies , can therefore say , that in all the european union countries statutory in cases of sickness is almost general been reduced so so-called supplementary inadequately underpinned role grows , and syrjintätekijät have been highlighted . 
on the other hand it is proposal for a directive , which to the following points : personal medical genetic information of the ; as a key issue , that should vakuutussopimuksen the is must requires terveystarkastusta ; vakuutuksenantajalla duty is to lifelong vakuutussuoja ; the union and the people mobile compensation to better together and finally , a sovittelujärjestelmä . 
we still positive the cross-border management , and therefore market forces are increasing extent applicable health . 
for example the united states is often ' example us ' free market economy . should fatal mistake must it example are with regard . 
is wrong , if the eu is to the terveystietoja , for example , the rules or if they contain demands all the insurance the and destroy therefore the supplementary inadequately underpinned diversity , which is now in force in many countries and which is actuarial principles in . 
ago was clear , that i was but the opportunity to treatment . 
it is all our member states citizens health and our regions cohesion . 
is not by chance , that i had faced of problems with the dutch taustani therefore . 
mr president , ladies and gentlemen parliament , mr rocard requires the commission to green paper statutory one hand and the nothing other than characteristics . 
this is a concern . 
mr president , we , which we have our lives in studied social issues , remember , that existing manuals should offer social protection was generally all state support measures , which seeks to help individuals and families then when they are economic crisis , which individuals or families are unable to itself . 
this means it , that is to carefully reasons , why public a system is failed miserably . 
supplementary his to legal rights and services system . 
by discrimination health on the basis of mr rocard should killed golden egg munivan hanhen . 
the commission will immediately , the action , and i to your report conclusions . 
i hope , of the proposals , which recognises , that skills and work participation are particularly important issues , but that is important to the still more the phenomenon , social exclusion and poverty work would be organised , . 
mr president , ladies and gentlemen parliament , i would like to congratulate the rapporteur his proposal also economic and monetary affairs committee for . 
the next item is the commission communication recommendations the council proposal for the opinion germany , finland and the dutch programmes for the updated . 
this is of us new ideas , and we ask , is the stability and growth pact has unnecessary , when a loppuluvun the objective is achieved quantitative , or whether future programmes appropriate to the other public economy of the aspects . 
the main message should be to is therefore , that it taxes to be margin is to strict public expenditure of . 
i can do as a whole positive summary . 
you mention , that one of the countries , which is also the european economy for one of the most important countries , namely germany , is at risk to situation , which remind there . 
. ( es ) mr president , thank you very much , mr della vedova . 
i assume , that you wanted to hear us today the these two subject : bse on the the fight against the current situation in europe and the french events . 
we propose the european union , the commission and our partners that these people would be set up tests to the europe scientists call - on in . 
therefore efficiency , independence and transparency are they avainperiaatteet , which is clearly food risk assessment in europe the . 
i later this the . 
these tests is absolutely however , be much more wider . 
is implemented active control measures , including the satunnaistestit , so that cases of bse prevent from the food and rehuketjuun . 
in such situations is always attractive hope some panacea , which could one stone to risk and to confidence . 
i member states on monday , arvelevatko they , that inspections of last years in shortcomings and community legislation lack are as the number of bse in . 
both must still be possible , rapid action and at the same time of the . 
you task is to create it quickly . 
it is very important requirement , in just bse has been handled . 
our group ask it , that meat and animal meal to go prohibits immediately all is the so long as member states are can guarantee bse : the prevention and union directives absolute the laws on the . 
mr commissioner , i do not know the commission , is it panacea , but i think experience is the precautionary principle , shown that under meat and bonemeal use is ban immediately all is nutrition , pigs and poultry , fish , including . 
i think parliament started the debate the , who is done this for the least , the council or the commission , or parliament , is it in unnecessary . 
firstly , and other are said it before me , is to test systematically all european food teurastettavat cattle . 
if we are courageous and ambitious , we can to european health interest and producers economic interests and we can therefore to confidence . 
i repeat yet , that the first are not responsible for no crisis . this is why the european union is show them the solidarity . 
i accept nor , that the some member states are so insolent , that they require provisions , because they are not testing . 
also the european solidarity is needed , because our policy is shown the lack of consistency , the meat and animal meal to go ruminants , as regards nitrates , pesticides . 
ago i must listen to mr gollnisch speaking parliament , that his group should been and the bse crisis in . 
we also , that all the esiintymäalueet limit and the prohibits exporting meat to until , until the security is guaranteed . 
it must be so , that we this the inadequately also political , . 
i am pleased , that we still tests of kokeilupohjalta . 
but , if we tests all compulsory , if destroy meat and bonemeal , if we , that the herd is slaughtered one tackle a medical complaint , , we demand is exactly the standards , especially among kauppakumppaneinamme the third countries , which are to union live animals , carcasses and meat preparations . 
reasons are quite elsewhere . 
mr president , i very pleased that the commission , that is finally to the broad tests position . france is namely now shown the bureau to find . 
which prevent us from and why which time must be crisis , so that we parliament vakuuttelisimme believe , that health is always the first of ? 
link luujauhosta from feed - this is otherwise very unnatural way for animals - and bse : the between is now all clear . 
i would ask the commission in this , the european to time a degree of harmonisation . 
i therefore urge the commission to the european the systems , which are in france for bse . 
otherwise auto-immune system is spreading and destroy it . 
without other is difficult to national and community legislation in this matter . 
also there is legislation , which is , how meat and animal meal to go and feedingstuffs must to - this is the second system be indispensable , which protect public health and food safety . 
is been said , that this is very expensive and that it is the number of carcasses and so still . 
examples , the drowning in belgium death caused tyyny , of tranquillizers medicines use in spain , the of ships ruumissa in italy and spain , 58 chinese tragic death in the uk it dover port after , when them was arrested on several occasions in europe , and karkotettuihin immigrants in various forced and pelottelukeinojen of use . 
this is i stand by my words , which i against their own , . 
women example violence is many forms of domestic violence , which is the reduction of working hours is a crime , is sexual exploitation , is trafficking in human beings . 
. ( es ) mr president , i would say , mr nogueira that around monetary policy model is , of course , the european central bank provisions in , and it , is the criteria in the treaty . 
mr president , i is very important to public internal and external effect , and me would be interested to know : will the commission to still now before the euro little real the money stability internal and external impact to ? 
if greece not measures , we already pending the procedure . 
we are to ensure , that monitoring and mittausjärjestelmä is there . 
in its decision the commission took to inform all member states arrangements and based in these specific soveltuvuuskriteereihin , which connected agreed by 2004 , when the french , system will be in force . 
as the lisbon european council said , inclusion , the european integration requires common efforts and action . 
secondly , so that takes into account , better the operators , ngos , local communities , social organisations and excluded itself experience . 
many older people would agree with this , as also they , which are worked low frequencies hours think , which are guarantees reasonable livelihood - for example maataloustyöntekijät . 
it cannot be people , which is mental difficulties . it cannot be the groups , which is not enough language skills to jobs . 
in the united states more flexible employment guarantees , that the köyhyysjaksot and työttömyysjaksot are very brief . 
in my country about 75 % of employees are given specific and below the poverty line in is women . 
this is important to , which we must try to , at least , . 
when the programme of procedures and facts , this appropriation must to . 
. ( i ) mr president , i would like to thank the rapporteur and to congratulate mrs figueiredo , and i would like to thank the other parliament members , which are not now present and which the other committees statements . 
i agree with the also , so that ngos as local and regional intermediaries and other active stresses the importance of , as you , and that the on the switched off the experience to a better . 
we have already agreed , that social protection committee meeting regularly parliament of the contact group with . 
the next item is rothe by the committee on industry , external trade , research and energy report ( a5-0320 / 2000 ) the european parliament and the council proposal for a directive renewable energy sources of electricity of the internal market electricity ( com ( 2000 ) of the 279 local - c5-0281 / 2000 - 2000 / 0114 ( cod ) ] ) . 
we need binding objectives now . 
the second important point , which committee supported , is renewable energy sources network accession and access to the problems . 
in my country in spain this framework compliance with the would , that this now to 2010 by into the atmosphere to 225 billion tonnes more co2 and that we could to kyoto objectives . 
mr president , mr the commissioner and ladies and gentlemen , is cannot be other than the commission proposal to create pleased framework , which , renewable energy sources of electricity of can increase the european union considerably in the medium term . 
however , risk internal market soveltumattomuudesta is always there . 
waste is not renewable resource , although it is day which still more and more . 
that is why this directive is now inevitably topical . 
i however , this proposal . warmly 
mr president , i would like to thank the rapporteur rothe excellent report , which is very topical this week , when we are trying to climate change the crisis . 
renewable energy sources of sähkönkäytön promoting is very gratifying . 
we need radical technical changes . 
so energy the proposals is one by one , and they not very consistent . 
and finally , i would like only to the three this debate is accentuated by the problem . 
on the other hand the principle , these national council amended objectives is be binding , because otherwise directive should content and of inadequate . 
the same reason we also partly amendment no 3 , but we however , amendment no 7 , which is too technical this text of the proposal . 
ladies and gentlemen parliament , we cannot accept the points , but which state aid rules on the condemns the . 
the next item is theorin , on behalf women rights and equal opportunities committee report ( a5-0308 / 2000 ) women in conflict peaceful to ( 2000 / 2025 ( ini ) ) . 
it where formal peace processes take are almost without exception men area , international experience and declarations show , how important is that women , in conflict and to rauhanrakentamiseen . 
the implementation , and the decisions are kriisinhallintaryhmien responsibility , and women expertise there is see or recognised . 
they want , must themselves de facto foreign policy and defence policy and believe , that men can to women interests . 
mr president , i would like firstly to say , how interested in this report , which i viable , i would like to viable even extremely the . 
we need also funding , which through this situation victims of women can help . 
mr president , now is already been said , and much not going to repeat things . 
mr president , mr the commissioner , i would like first to congratulate mrs theorin , which is promoter of this excellent report , which is important and topical issue . how therefore women essential participation negotiations of to could change the world and to the violent disputes must violence and culture peace , dialogue and differences democratic to culture should be ? 
that is why i support the report demands it , that women should right to diplomatic role . 
report for is been much research , it is a , rigorous , and it can be basic principles to the very clearly , as , for example 17 article , it is courageous , but at the same time it is very practical and it is really important proposals . 
in i would like condemn all rape and all slavery . 
the fifth point is echo , the european community humanitarian aid office , which parliament is asked and provoked to the also observed . 
the problem is , that it millions of people , before all women , make this work and that it is also very of demand but that this work is not regulated at all . 
i think member states must to regulate this matter employment guidelines , what is through the european parliament already been asked these guidelines on opinion . 
siirtolaisväestö is generally in this area a group , which requires specific measures , as specific support centres for , which offer the necessary aid . 
this is a question member states . 
the need is increased last years , but this fact is , however , just of arrangements at work and to the rights and with regard to . 
( the sitting was closed at 12 midnight ) 
( very loud applause ) 
we is not only create freedom and peace of internal system also be it the rules and the european community ways , which the european union and is been decades for . 
when we federal constitutional structure to the first step , is a framework of , that we can to broad as possible democratic dialogue between these two republic relations nature . 
you the european parliament members , which represent directly union member states citizens , the european citizens , you can understand why a best , to join europe seems the yugoslavia of us the citizens very uncertain . 
let us continue along sitting . 
this is a very important for citizens and interesting this , and should reasonable , that we can to the decision today days . 
the commission announced then that six months the within a specific proposal , and it is have a . 
this , the european union is already there asiakirjajulkisuuskäytäntöä , and is reason remember , that courageous citizens and many progressive member states are already many years fought for it , that transparency is increasing . 
this report requires still more work on also parliament , and it therefore i believe , that it must still here improve . 
we pleased to see , that report is a important principle , which also we support the committee on budgetary control absolutely . 
now to the citizen to information also the issues , which are not media and interest groups in unpopular , so that he could better to open and democratic debate , which is so considerable importance : the eu to the confidence for . 
the committee on petitions , would like that documents being published more quickly . 
immediately , when secrecy is not justified , documents is of course change such . 
i would like also to emphasise , that all citizens is guarantee access to documents as possible right many form . 
political responsibility learn is not confuse citizens justice to information . 
i would like to urge all the rapporteurs reference to parliament of rights these provisions , which the public right to information documents , and i urge all colleagues to very carefully the , that their interests is driven public interests at the expense of . 
these areas access to documents is not guaranteed , and it denied , also the european parliament citizens , which is otherwise must even official announcement of documents and which is to hear the . 
the is but one very difficult to accept point . 
mr president , i would like firstly to thank mr cashman the very good work , which he is done on this report . 
this is very important report , which is important part of the , what we can to eu : the new julkisuusperiaatteeksi . 
( technical failure ) 
this is not it only have unlimited right to information all documents , but of course , that the also we finally to open the door , so that the council known the council is can no longer in future to issues alone in metternich fashion and to the after cheap more beautiful people become in brussels ( brussels-bashing ) . 
secondly , i would remind exceptions on work . 
we populations must europe , a precise , where decisions are closed doors behind . 
treaty article 255 , this regulation is accept before 1.5.2001 , , two years after the amsterdam treaty , when the is become into force . 
let , that the now some problems , which this currently prevent the commission to certain amendments . 
as i mentioned earlier , we can be agree in principle with some amendments , but we do is technical and administrative cooperation , for example , documents , and registration of amendments , . 
we have is not no written document , and i would like , that the commission would also be recommendations parliament members in writing . 
welcome 
we welcome the , that credit risk mitigate and particularly for small companies to guarantees stresses . 
blokland , on behalf report ( a5-0321 / 2000 ) to the european parliament and the council common text waste incineration [ c5-0371 / 2000 - 1998 / 0289 ( cod ) ] 
mr president , may i ask liberals to this issue a little käytännöllisemmin , and i this also be co-rapporteur . 
the ppe-de group and the pse group is therefore common hope , that the vote postponing november to part-session . 
i propose therefore , that villiers report on the vote to november second part-session . 
i followed sittings to staff me by order , and parliament decided not to the changes . 
as president i can say you only this ; i can say kollegananne , that i agree with you . 
it also , that they welcomed at the beginning of the european parliament negative , when announced dangers in britain , second stage , when scandal was going through in britain , measures were once confined to this country , in practice , without that should immediately been programme control tighten and rehuruokinnan reform the in europe . 
that is why we want to the four great education , which is in the future of be . 
. ( fr ) we voted for this common resolution . 
. ( pt ) creutzfeldt-jakob disease new form in england and france are caused the situation , that ' mad cows ' ( bse ) is been more i am quite happy on the agenda . 
some governments are because not wanted spread panic among citizens or they are wanted to avoid economic disasters , they are not made the necessary information in time the commission or are not dangerous phenomena ensimerkkien following the drawing up the action taken products consumption and the exports to immediately ban . 
farmers are can to this crisis alone : is a plan to support and measures to restore consumer confidence . 
union all institutions , the commission , the council ( parliament ) inability to such appropriate to combat drug abuse , which could be to the member states turvallisuustarpeisiin , which this matter directly concerns , namely to hierarkiaongelmia single market restrictions and our citizens health and safety standards between . 
the council with the many discussions , we can be satisfied with the several . 
landfill time is now drawing to a close , and they replace the environment is adopt technology . 
process in the social partners and particularly the representatives sensitive groups , which this programme is to , 
although we namely is welcome economic growth and return to the fall in unemployment , we cannot hide , obstinate continuing and even the escalation . 
the rapporteur is i think right to authorities , social and civil society greater participation measures , so that poverty and social exclusion to now to . 
poor workers , which are most women and which part-time work , small pay and full uncertainty , are those of , which is , in particular on public speeches emphasize kopeasti ignored . 
prime minister three years ago the social exclusion unit , which is government to social exclusion to reduce by developing models various problems to resolve . 
these equipment is now more than 60 roottoria , and they the size thousand jalkapallokenttää . 
dependence on imported energy , which is the union about 50 % , to to 70 % by 2020 by , if renewable energy sources is being developed . 
clear is that , nuclear energy and nuclear waste in handling is to find a reasonable and most effective safety standards . 
we must therefore to energy , which is already naturally there , but which is been unused , so long as it is not developed technology of . 
asem iv preparation process is to be opportunity the democracy requirement therefore , that the ensure parliaments and civil society access to information and participation , which means , including social forum of , and on the other hand is fully into account social , environmental and human rights . 
last recently this parliament is suffered some mistakes and even to the criticism . 
we discovered , that parliament was central america is through the same stages as also parliament in its early stages , because it was and still is to fight to more powers , resources and visibility and to edustuksellisuuttaan of . 
central america parliament is to the european parliament , the respect , credibility and legitimacy , which is be based on the political groups , because the puoluetoiminta reflects , or at least it should reflects , loyally the in society . 
human rights we supported since 1990 , of cooperation programmes , which promote respect for human rights , education and information through . 
( b5-0855 / 2000 ) tabled van den bos on behalf of the eldr group ; 
vaali-ilmapiiriä last weeks by extreme disruption is ivory coast , which is at least until this been model economic area , is the country , which is economic crisis , social and the hopelessness it through political chaos . 
political and religious leaders , military must do everything national reconciliation to . 
the debate norsunluurannikkolaisuutta through - this confused debate through , which is the a national preference of , which we are in countries and which logical and final consequence of is ethnic cleansing is to be - and fully all côte d ' ivoire the constitution norsunluurannikkolaisuutta the reference to or sivumerkitykset . 
he is supported constitutional reform , which was to be the most important his opponents watara it on the basis of , that his both parents are not norsunluurannikkolaisia . 
mr president , ladies and gentlemen , although côte d ' ivoire was earlier western and central african other countries the stability and democracy asylum , in is already long been ethnic and religious tension and the previous government recently committed president bedién under power abuse , which led to finally violent sotilasvallankaappaukseen . 
condemn ethnic violence and especially the political leaders , which is the caused by demagoguery . 
the next item is the joint debate on the following motions for resolutions , which the situation in burma and vietnam : 
the eu : the and asean between meeting , which is to must in december in laos , offers us crucial opportunity to condemn , that what harshest this administration . 
i otherwise nor trust own ministereihimme it , that they take the there to . 
aseanista is become word in sense paper tiger the failure of the events in burma . 
junta is told that it is , divide the party . 
it is historic afflictions , and situation is , of course , difficult . 
these small improvements - which are certainly not the socialist group has tabled amendments , of mr sakellariou , to - is a been last years , and they are led to situation , which is not , no longer tragic but which is , however , still very bad and which is which , not nyky-vietnamin challenges level . 
mr swoboda , the european parliament is flexible and effective . 
should , however , good if the president is to focus hanoi only mutual cooperation but on the contrary to the cooperation conditional on vietnam firm promises to improve the country is ihmisoikeusoikeustilannetta . 
i urge the council and the commission to firm protests vietnam authorities räikeille religious freedom gravest crimes . 
process is led also the , that the commission and vietnam are signed in 1995 cooperation agreement . 
we of course the they parts of which were , this motion for a resolution . 
i as with the , that we is all we can do , but their shall also help the situation by it , which is their and many other unhappy situation throughout the world . 
the issues the medium and long term . 
mr president , mr commissioner , the commission floods , which is last weeks the considerable different regions and other european countries - great britain , spain , ireland and france - to parliament once the , problem , which is urgent emergency aid to victims of displaced persons , and of companies to help , also problem , which is more long-term policy , which prevent this broad natural disasters occurring . 
the transport sector requires our most eminent architects to continued growth of , which is estimated to be more than 38 % next decade . 
the debate is closed . 
this is perhaps this parliament ways and decides not to adopt , but i feel extremely difficult for to understand that the european parliament , is a subject commitments and to the european commission these tasks this small limited number of members . 
( parliament rejected the proposal ) . 
eu : the economic and social policy , which is led to purchasing power and a reduction in tulonhankkimismahdollisuuksien workers , new diseases such pharmaceutical companies and hillittömyys have caused a substantial increase terveydenhoitomenoihin . 
the lapses , therefore very broad longer private insurance companies , provided that single because these not ( first ) sick and premiums concluded diseases , . 
they , which are not spend and much money , are no longer not no . 
mr president , ladies and gentlemen parliament , i particularly welcome the , that i can today to speak for my constituency fine future drew attention to an present the , and i warmly welcome the . 
it requires it , but that is enough time institutions to prepare for new rules . 
the report is growing consensus , which seeks to the regulation inability to of finance ten last year in happened development . 
we risk lieventämistekniikoiden better account of the and we also basel committee of the general . 
also we believe that this report to significant and positive in the process . 
finally , and this is a key issue , we fully aware that the , we respect the treaty is the balance between institutions . 
the vote will take place tomorrow at 9 a.m . 
mr president , let me conclude before , to take this opportunity want ombudsman söderman such a way as to congratulate him and his work poor administration to combat and therefore also community institutions to close to citizens . 
mr president , the european parliament is positive , according virkamiesperinteen in the for emphasised , that the ombudsman should improve and to that . 
the vote will take place tomorrow at 9 a.m . 
it is right to documents citizen a fundamental right , and any documents not left the more important than koepaperit . 
of us to justified , that candidate can access to korjattuun koepaperiinsa , because information access to documents is a fundamental right , which it is recognised , just this week adopted charter of fundamental rights . 
this must be . 
all other institutions and bodies would follow this example , as the committee on petitions is recommended . 
the european union citizens should be positive the community institutions in dealing with the . 
new thing in this case is that the european union , it must to best practices and to avoid all , which thus , the credibility the member states . 
other institutions goes without depends on whether , in this report or the ombudsman in the respect the wishes of the procedures . 
minutes of yesterday 's sitting the is been distributed . 
if a inevitable accident prevent them from being , then democracy is gap , but if they are not here to , they are not votes . 
we can must not be surrounding the bse crisis valvontakriteerejä , but the other aspects is reason to , in particular omavaraisuusastetta , which is arviointimittari a opponents , for which is the funds by the luottoriskejä . 
the european police academy interim a 
police cooperation is fundamental , to achieve a our , , so that we can to ensure the european citizens high safety freedom , security and the european area of justice . 
the european union enlargement and citizens free movement of the enlargement must join additional safety measures , which guarantee peaceful cooperation between member states . 
my view the french and portuguese prisons conditions are very different . 
this means , that if you want to create common standards , they is first define , because otherwise education will very varied . 
posselt work , to finally , the provision that police henkilöstökoulutukseen must be also respect for human rights and defence right on things , and this currently as important , and appropriate proposal is a virtual police academy , a which use the internet opportunities . 
now we have , however , in strasbourg almost autiossa chamber to hear something almost incredible . 
this is a good idea , and the european union , where people can enjoy free movement , free trade and sijoittumisoikeudesta and where scotland will passengers can go sisiliaan or greece , it is only requires , that develop common the rule of law ylläpitojärjestelmä . 
in the netherlands police training is conflict 's and appalled at tolerance , when alakulttuurien of , ethnic minorities , churches of pakopaikkoina people , which is not official residence permit , and the political protests in normal wants to do is to . 
it , which believes own good bases its decisions , is not fear the comparison of other solutions . 
i hope , that college offers a this the to in the future . 
this is a good example europe , which we already today to networks europe , which nations are directly dealing with each other , without that sustain unnecessary supranational structures . 
keskusviranomaiset are in fact done most lapsikaappaustapaukset very effectively and in all member states properly . 
this maladministration it is therefore very central issue , because neutrality , kaunistelematon the social development and equal rights and obligations to all the european union citizens require it . 
it before we this measure , and to vote for it . 
because we sympathy for the objective of , we accept the proposed measures . 
as days on refers to the fact clearly , which are often the ääriin come to children . 
parliament opinions this issue , as the european court , case-law , the commission confirm view . 
i know , that fifa is already tried to more time , and it is for quite too long to find at all of the answers official statement , which was in 1998 . 
is natural that , in the future union represents wadassa sport for the commissioner . 
the united kingdom decision to introduce ei-brittiläisiä rahdinkuljettajia on tax 
ireland is , of course , very small but open market , and , most of the , what we buy , will the united kingdom . 
finally , i would like to say , that we premature debate this issue the european parliament here , but this fact support the commission and commissioner vitorino by this and statement , which shows clearly , that the uk government is right to introduce eurovinjettijärjestelmä , as long as it is already in the rules and regulations within . 
mr president , taxes and the sensible solutions are of course , is at least so in austria , which we are constantly debate this issue and which of course constantly seek good liikenneratkaisuja . 
proposal is not a case of discrimination against rahdinkuljettajien or other drivers in europe british drivers for . 
he pays vinjettimaksua unnecessarily much , if in is not some päiväperusteista erityiskorvausta . 
on 22 november 2000 , , just the same day , when was king juan carlosin , which opened the democratisation of the spanish , kruunauksen 25 years of this , one democracy merkkihenkilöistä was in turn sacrifice their lives receiving freedom , tolerance and respect for diversity . 
i would ask you therefore to recent muistissanne these speeches . 
the european union neuvottelukannassa on to the kyoto environmental and land-use changes and in it , ' only ' on issue , kyoto mechanism and national measures between in , the ' complementarity ' and the complying with . 
is the eu should sitting in preparing to the discussions all issues , but it should concentrate on priorities , particularly in the ' only ' mechanisms , ' complementarity ' and compliance with the effective system . 
minister prescott is now on water , and do not know how long , he is ground . 
the last comment : i is good , that remain in the house firm hiilinieluasiassa , before all therefore , that is very difficult to measure sinks carefully . 
nuclear energy is not return . 
we must , however , to forward , and in may 2001 in bonn must to a parity . 
in may 2001 in bonn the beijing + 5 conference should still to this compromise . 
we the climate change challenge is undoubtedly one of the challenges of the 21st century , if we want in future live in this earth . 
the same concerns co2-nielujen , as forests lisäistutusten , the partial , . 
hague meeting will continue as if us , mr commissioner next spring the commission in bonn . 
mr president , thank you for your speech the commission commissioner wallström . 
if is issues , which is been paperwork , so the of the european parliament delegation and the commission relations between . 
it alternative , that the cop6-kokouksessa is in agreement , is not there . 
we very constructive and we negotiated in the hague last until the . 
you is the floor , mr council president . 
social security systems coordination , taxation , asylum , visas and immigration and in which is very important subject are still major problems in some countries . 
i would add , that the european parliament paikkajaosta is not yet been reached agreement . 
a the to , which will enable the union the new members accession after all , which are the actively , is a key challenge union and especially enlarged union for the future . 
president is , of course , the so-called this debate . 
social action programme will take place european council , which , of course , we hope confirm it in nice . 
you see , how close negotiations will nice . 
unanimity requirement to 27 or more member states , the union only that any development is impossible all they areas , which is to unanimity . 
you mentioned , which the european parliament codecision in . 
( applause ) 
the challenge is old our continent reunification of europe ; that challenge is of an unprecedented enlargement , and nice is to prepare the us . 
mr president , nice summit the most important objective is the european union and to prepare this union enlargement . 
mr president , mr council president , mr president , i think the commission 15 member states governments are not this by managed very very . 
this is not the right method . 
now is proposed , that 49 the decided by a qualified majority . 
majority destroy member states parliamentary democracies veto , but the eu from itself is a parliamentary democracy . 
mr president , europe needs leadership , clarity , choices and determination . 
biarritz european council conclusions in the light of we accept blackmail declaration to , although declaration should informal . 
we really it with , that nice conclusions is position , which include the commission calls on to this area on framework directive . 
i position nice agreement , when i see it , but what is the discussions here to is been a little confused experience . 
amsterdam countries and governments heads of state were already again category , and this is now a number of jälki-istuntoon nice . 
if the and small difference between the council is too , the european union can largely be a few years to difficult legitimaatiokriisi , because small are no longer know every all for fear , that cannot no longer to defend identity . 
the french president and prime minister are to think more own political future than the european future . 
if text is included in the treaty and if it is only politically , may be serious legal having problems interpreting . 
on the other hand , i that is important to europe institutions loud , so that it contents herself with calling toimielintyhjiötä , which is intensified economic development in the euro . 
this reform is declared objective institutions more effective , so that they are expanding europe , and certainly there is the democratic deficit reduction . 
it is therefore also 133 committee under article restructuring : it , that it accountability to clearly , that the agenda and conclusions are understandable and that it is a composition of and comprehensive . 
mr president , i not only today the council president-in-office but all member states governments , when i say , that difficult issues are going , if nice is to the agreement . 
codecision last year we experience shows , that it is . 
so i , that the first step trade policy should be already clear , that trade policy is to expand majority decision-making the . 
he was seitsemänvuotiaana like to country of the red army before attack and piileksimään ojissa to neuvostokoneiden pudottamilta pommeilta . 
mr méndez de vigo referred rightly charter of fundamental rights . 
more we can expect him . 
the , which seems to day by the act of folly , is not , quite vähäisimmistä possible consensus elements , but unfortunately only , however , small , very small consensus elements . 
mr president , i would like first to thank parliament members , because this was the debate i think very high-quality . 
' it is therefore not the , that this should been the , it is not avoimuusongelmasta . 
fair kiertojärjestelmä the namely also large countries , because could also be other , in stage without the commissioner . 
i believe , that parliament must see the european union , that is better institutional framework , which , it should be able to it the european union , which bring development us all together . 
the vote will take place tomorrow . 
mr president , i would like to mr van orden , . 
i am the it , that visit so-called minister threatened , whether it turkish or who any other . 
is itself clear , that we here european democracy building will guarantee all interesting and here for safety . 
minister for health , human dignity basis to drugs liberalisation the grounds that it , that huumepillerit are not to the detriment of and would , that ' we and marihuanalla ' . 
it is at least was heavily defeated act , i would say to parliament , the ; it also , the european parliament that members is not the nothing to say human rights , although they are just very by a large majority , they are adopted charter of fundamental rights absent this the european union forum , which they in last year throw its full weight radius ideas ngos and institutions with . 
we talked about this matter now enough . 
the european parliament and the commission position was already before amsterdam it , that the commission should be foreign policy the vice-president , which should at the same time to the representative tasks and be a special responsibility in the council . 
and as the european parliament made before feira summit by resolution 15 june , it should accept tomorrow text , which is in keeping the position before nice european council start . 
the european security and defence policy development is an important new challenge , eurooppa-hankkeessa and therefore the institutional framework is clarify . 
nice european council should make a number of decisions , which i next . 
in january the first debate the commission will be a platitude budget period cannot development policies seurantataulukon , which are clear commitments , the payments and of the community budget or the of the most important edf : of rahoitettavista programmes . 
we have done work also regional cooperation , for which concept was a opposition the countries , among which are not to back to the past , which they are for , and i believe can say , that summit , these countries understood , that regional cooperation is not contrary to the european union and the development of convergence with , which are before all this , of and very much that i stabilisation and assosiointistrategian through . 
portuguese presidency , earlier , summit took place india with and later will be ministerial meeting with asean . 
we must give the discourage us . 
i would remind you , how is it to be able to the humanitarian aid , the citizens we had , conflict prevention and also blow , thereby of by . 
it is of course , that the european union is decisions independently and that the commitments are less responsible voluntary and political . 
he is more than most done people conflict to a very -including part of the world , and him is rightly words of thanks around the world his efforts . 
some of the lehtijutuista , which these troops of is written -including country best , i think are very particular been . 
i would like to thank the rapporteur lalumière it , that he stressed conflict prevention the report , which the commission is preparing together the nice european council representative with for . 
thank you very much , mr commissioner christopher patten the commission . 
this is i think the first real test the european union . 
kärsimättömät citizens complain , that the european bureaucracy the prolong the debate unnecessarily extremely slowly . 
citizens is , however , be able to information and their is to be able documents as possible largely . 
the proposals is still completely unclear , what this role must be . 
the european tickets with car is what only , the syrjityimmälle pakolaisleirillekin . 
mr president , this is why i it with , that the european is to decide to take action now . 
if we european we cannot to conflict resolution responsible role independently the united states , the we is take account of it , that us system as other conflicts . 
personal commitment is but replaces union security and defence policy democratic legitimacy . 
i cannot accept mrs lalumière report certain details . in the final vote support report be rejected . 
this broad siviilikonfliktinestovälineistön omission in the long term is a mistake , and then i not the council and the references , that it is the already done decisions , that some it is . 
as you , vote against both reports and are to all our efforts to policy against , which ... 
thirdly : we create is non-nuclear power on , which palme once of sweden , olof was , baltic the black sea . 
i would like to congratulate the rapporteur lalumière his report . 
brok report is also the cfsp high representative of the mandate in the long term , i think . that the current situation is not take . 
i say mr van orden and other colleagues , that this is a pity , because time for each of the irish sea - - behind the colleagues should very much for this in the traditions , experience and practices . 
the european parliament together with member states parliaments is in this purpose best for body . 
this latest progress of the experience is i think benefit in the future , when we it , we must create that the european defence policy and -valmius , which is the european integration i as an essential factor as common money . 
i also it with , that different instruments the european union is particularly to the quality and the opportunity and that we is in the future create real conflict prevention and management european culture , if this policy is and establish position . 
i believe , that this subject will become a positive dialogue . 
mr president , ladies and gentlemen , the commission resignation in march 1999 the structures and the need for reform of working methods . 
reform , if it can to create the from , is be clear , and it is to unions and the staff , and the staff is really be in the process . 
this procedure requires time , but it is necessary for reform and an essential point . 
the commission reform is an essential measure our institutions for the future . 
the report , i tutkiskellut only white paper , but also an independent committee of independent experts second report and parliament on 19 january by , michiel van hulten by resolution this committee of independent experts work . 
the court of auditors report is clear that , in advance had withdrawn his or her judgement is no objection , if cancellation with other at least equal guarantees antavilla procedures , which can be this , to the other factors than rahoitustarkastajia . 
the organisations are throughout changing more transparent ; the more we are calling for ; they will use information technology new way ; they to the traditional on vertical organisaatiomuodoista and exchange information organisations within and between the . 
mr president , mr commissioner , the commission ladies and my colleague , the commission white paper presented by mr kinnock is laajuudestaan , to directly institutional questions . 
talked about the common foreign policy in the debate this afternoon . 
finally , is to complicated issue , which the proposal early retirement benefit in . 
financial control decentralisation dg the situation is important step , but it is only , if staff is properly trained , if resources is sufficient and if decision-makers are accountable . 
institution and the päälliköllä will be clear to the best possible administration . 
disciplinary procedures but is been promises , but so far no clear rules , clear statements , the how these rules should apply , and outside the not been still once and for all . 
this change is necessary god palvelemiseksi sincerely , and the cannot force rules through . 
as everyone reform , which to standard , the situation is obvious , that is be vigilant and precise . 
withdraw but amendment no 6 and we split vote amendment no 15 point the latter part of the ecb , because of the current system is not believe that this situation . 
when i was earlier , the parliament of was jacques delors , which the commission commissioner brittan worked and him before the commission , namely the commissioner with . 
mr president , ladies and the commission members , ladies and gentlemen , this reform of our expectations are justified . 
the things as the bse crisis , high oil prices and greenhouse effect are clearly european issue . 
with the public must also be a feeling , that the commission is indeed easily approach and open . 
the european parliament is reform central subject , which it can to a budgetary authority as and when . 
it is in kanavassa many clear procedure , which the can for the officials to palkanneen institutions within and outside it . 
that is why i am convinced , that we is pleasure to hear you and . 
mr garriga polledo , let me say briefly , that the financial perspective the headings are into force . 
also the commission staff is support reform , and that is why it must accept it . 
we believe that cosmetic reform is not with the thorough change recently . 
mr president , ladies and my colleague , i would like first to quite the commission reform and the effects the rapporteur sauquillo the own-initiative report quality , which concerns the european union relations with developing countries efficiency . 
we want more responsibility . 
before than of projects support is to try to all the exploitation reasons and they seek , which are interest , have benefited from and used in the wrong people , and blame them . 
just so that the commission , commissioner nielson is committed to kollegiaaliselle responsibility , he undoubtedly to defend this evening proposal . 
yet huolestuttavammalta of us feel that the commission proposal , it is still regional distinction . 
for example in 2001 economic responsibility subsequently 22 delegation , 15 representation , and it has become necessary updated ulkomaanyksiköille is 40 posts . 
maritime safety 
but erika and the sun are been french vessels . 
it is in fact been the most important issues the commission the after the erika sank , when what is termed with 11 months ago . 
we hope and expect , that 21 december to transport the council meeting more for , union institutions common determination to improve maritime safety and that there is a common position each these three text . 
i believe , that this agreement is in sight , but we must be sure of that agreement , is implemented . 
i welcome the minister to to have two other report quickly as possible , and that is why i welcome firstly , his proposal to discuss this in december , if possible . 
this all the result we have direktiivimuutoksesta report , which is different aspects on improvements , which will luokitusjärjestelmän improvement , because it is the best instrument maritime safety to guarantee . 
however , the years heritage , when substances only at sea , is that were sunk , and it is sometimes returned from people protesting us , very often the most serious consequences . 
this is why publication of information is important element , when it develop way , which a public can to information , and so hätäpuhelinnumeroita still . 
i much another ehdotussarjalta and the european maritime safety agency perustamiselta . 
i agree welcome , but we can negotiate only results , which is dealt with in the council . 
we know , that port state control by is not been a earlier effective weapon alusturvallisuuden to guarantee , we know , that all classification are not taken its vessels is for adduce properly and reliably but rather carelessly , and we know , that tankers , which is not , as are uivia time bombs . 
we are building the new credibility and we should spoil this credibility on the other hand the commission on the wrong action . 
the , which are not this responsibility seriously , must remain absent we brought to an end and knowledge . 
watts report stricter measures serious risk or mukavuuslippuvaltion under its vessels to undeniably but mukavuuslippuvaltioita . 
i however , pleased that the commission proposals , that is the main repeated the french coastal the the requests the single-hull vessels ban , control to ports and the assessment . 
i also his , nevertheless called again voyage data on the issue of in the . 
the merikelpoisuuden to called for the responsible for the institutions and tarkastuksilta considerable measures , as is already been said . 
briefly , , measures are not enough binding safety to raise direction level . 
all the speak , and it is right , because i fully is not yet been achieved the 25 % objective , which ports example control are . 
alone are no longer enough compromises , and not is also difficult to progressive steps to take . 
i would like to emphasise in this context classification societies - and it is also i for yet again the - topical debate the closest attention to against liability . 
the port state controls , is important rules to control and still more effective . 
doing nothing large companies to is clear sign it , that they is more power than people elected institutions . 
mr president , ladies and gentlemen , is certain , that the safety and still people safety and environmental protection the question is very serious . 
before reports goes this direction . 
we agree with ruumiinvammoja , deaths and property mention the damage to the vähimmäiskorvauksista , when member states the opportunity to those borders . 
new technologies and the vessels are part of planning improving this important work . 
we must to agreement as possible high level of maritime safety and the regulation . 
i am pleased to say , that the commission supports many these three report the amendments . 
the commission cannot accept amendments 6 , 7 and 8 but amendment no 1 only partly . 
imo : the is expected to accept the formally on the timetable next april meeting . 
the task is to , that classification society to still directive , quality requirements and to the performance . 
the commission appreciates it , that the originally proposed by the limit support . 
this is one of the again , how important is accept a more effective , preventive and strengthening community measures to protect our seas . 
mr turco , i heard your comments and i will matter . 
we expect , will be forthcoming december inform the council common position , and the forward are the priority , that we quite the first task is to completed two other report quickly as possible , by states , if possible . 
mr president , i would like amendment no 2 proposes a oral amendments , that it is words : ' urge the council and the commission in this context . 
( parliament adopted the resolution ) . 
mckenna report ( a5-0336 / 2000 ) 
but capital support privatisation of classification societies , which shipping companies hands , and to state authorities europeans , convinced europeans control or even these authorities osallisuudella . 
it , is good , that mr watts and the rapporteurs as and piétrasanta are tried up the gaps , which the commission proposal still is . 
responsibility measures is the member states . 
is can be possible , that only will sail still here , when they elsewhere have lost the 2005 , 2010 or 2015 after . 
mr hatzidakis to but proposals , which restrict the commission proposals . 
stricter legislation promoting international level is to as maritime safety policy the key objectives . 
particularly important is to clear , that the polluter pays principle is be fully in force . 
the community , must imo : the action to improve , because if because should real poliisivaltuudet to ism-säännöstön the , it should europol , effective instrument . 
so long as the of will cheaper than the compliance with , the maximum companies continue to choices are to do . 
nice european council preparation 
the charter of fundamental rights , rather than that improve human rights and social rights , it facilitate measures , which the undermined . 
unfortunately , i find this view but motions for resolutions . 
although my sometimes other , it , that prime minister lionel jospin spoke here only rarely this presidency in ' political co-existence , ' , i know how strongly he is patistanut ministers , and i would like to it the . 
social issue the proposals are very modest and they even not the content the lisbon summit , in particular no promises it , as they on economic and social cohesion strengthening . 
in this for we should not to the eu 's development a decision , which the european citizens could alienate . 
the british want eu : the reform that it accountability and efficiency . 
this text as an excuse to future ( and still etäisempää ) enlargement already waiting to receive an vetelevän system to . 
now is arguing about no longer only ' ' and ' the small ' between , but also the ' ' between . 
. ( sv ) we welcome and support report , which deals with many important common foreign and security policy kehittämissuuntauksia . 
as which year , the european parliament in this traditional largely cfsp : the annual report reiterates ever seen a have method , which , in some in the federalist vakoa to constantly to disregard the more than takes the decisions european councils . 
it jutellessamme he heard , that we organising the european countries provided military , which would prepared to peace in europe and to the region . 
the european parliament to is also not to it , the resources at european rapid action number should be available , and should be to , for example , at sea and in the fight against for for resources . 
future conflicts is to military interventions and initially those , but social , economic and ecological justice for policy through . 
we in this european army , as also nato and their own national armeijaamme . 
report is , for example , quite far too far-reaching we cfsp : of nato , and the , how ' threats force of ' to showing conflicts preventative action , which is directly contrary to un : the charter with . 
ten years east in turbulent after we have with it , that these reports will candidate countries in message ' the european biggest peace project of ' . 
only six of these points contains statements , which are subject . 
unfortunately , it is clearly to national aborttilait or even punish or to abortion against religious traditions . 
. ( de ) many tens of thousands of the european union women would be very happy certainly the , that we we here informal economy in the kotitaloustyön regulation , if they know it . 
the rapporteur proposes smet , including it , that the european level kotitaloustyö defined . 
kotitaloustyöntekijöiden needs should be of the työsuhdelainsäädäntöä . 
they are paid part pensions of for national governments , which are immediately destroyed they have disappeared taitavien silmänkääntäjien way . 
the european union nations for group to finally , , that the european union citizens expect now more than never , that uudistustoimissa and in view of countries in the beliefs and diversity . 
human resources , new administrative reform priority must to workers competence and better transparency buildings in general . 
this explanation of vote , i to to the guests and pleaded with it , and that we parliament is unfortunately not all the powers , which it should . 
i would like to conclude council . 
good mr barón crespo , information are really contradictory . 
this is not the socialist group wish . 
just this is why we now is difficulties : this summit is important , and we say , that it only binds us in the future . 
i mention , is that committee meets tomorrow afternoon before all to it , what exactly , were intergovernmental conference conclusions . 
( parliament adopted the proposal ) . 
i would grateful , if extensions this request . 
i would like also to , that a few days ago ' grey nationalist action party department ' by one tukinälkälakossa the in rotterdam . 
it is should , of course , been at all necessary if the council in june , should drawn attention to a little more or drawn at all attention to the first reading and the european commission amended proposal , which was finally , in line than we . 
ago thirdly must to , whether we adopted provisions really internal market of improving or whether they respect within investing objective . 
the second concern , which is a purely legal , is it , received us endeavour above all more closely together market harmonisation and health protection in this regard too the explanatory statement , in which community justice recently stopped advertising on directive - these arguments must read in an equally determined , so that the very could conclude that , these two points are hard to reconcile . 
mr president , ladies and gentlemen , now when creutzfeldt-jakob disease new version of is caused 80 deaths in europe , the european union , it the council of ministers , the commission and parliament decide to meat and bonemeal of and more than 30 months at cattle access to food chain without preliminary tests . 
we believe that is natural that article 95 , and 135 article are this directive , as the legal basis now proposes amendment no 1 . 
the court of justice , internal market good on behalf of the total ban on tobacco is cannot be to defend . 
what will texts , as ' low-tar ' , ' mild ' and ' light ' , i still it with , that they are misleading , and that is why i am really amendments 10 and 30 . 
i would like to also the treaties in obligations . 
mr maaten is very rightly proposed , that this legal basis for reference to article , article 133 second , which is exchange reserves to external , and he is also proposed a number of changes some articles , so that this directive is moitittaisi of the decision of the case-law . 
i regret the , that also legal and the internal market in committee is been positions , which the court ban , which the tobacco advertising ban , would in some way of this directive . 
indeed , because i on the environment , public health and consumer policy the commissioner , many different groups have tried to the fact that it me , tobacco sales and presentation is be regulated in europe more . 
ironic , , i see , however , this directive at all ban tobacco system community - although , for example , such as greece countries reared tobacco is so strong , that this directive in the use cigarettes for a crime should . 
i think is reason to thank the commissioner also byrne , that the legal basis is been very clearly . 
more than half a million people die in the european union , which year and is certainly number of , if we work now . 
nor this legal basis is not i see no benefit at all , and therefore is right , that trade unions , companies and gentlemen remind parliament loss of jobs . 
i would like to see to photographs introduced varoituksissa , a sensible , the european trans-european research , health for measures which , help children to free smoke , tervasta , regard and dependence . 
also on the environment , public health and consumer policy in committee were prepared compromise . 
reserve to article 3 , as i understand , i amendment , tar , nicotine and carbon monoxide in . 
when is the directive quite common in acts , we can to as another , and it is therefore we be it completely . 
very suurikokoisen warning of some major packaging for should respect the right solution . 
finally , report is been , 54 amendments , and i pleasure is tell you , that the commission cannot accept the 33 either completely or partially . 
the most important criterion these amendments and five years ' time to report on behalf of the european union is in fact enlargement , which nice summit , is particularly apposite and appropriate . 
summer-time it after all , on hand ultimately improved quality of life with , because summer-time positive effects take much profit of the temporary disadvantages , which itself in the is . 
summer-time is not a problem common europe . 
the commission one again of the directive five years of after is . 
also computers or electronic of manufacturers and kalentereiden and päiväkirjojen producers is demands . 
mr president , mr the commissioner , ladies and gentlemen , patients for necessary medical research is acceptable quickly and flexibly , but it is in its credit intact strictly ethics based on borders and tutkimushenkilöitä is protect as possible very exploitation . 
this is important difference , which we do this , in our report . 
this , although certain questions which the council with looming is outstanding , i would like to remind , that result , which we want this directive , the achieve , is the long and fruitful kompromissityöstä , which have done our rapporteur , which i would like to thank liese and to congratulate his saturday and constructive menettelytavastaan and the council , which is shown utmost transparency and the amendments the committee on the environment , which adopted the second reading . 
i am thinking before all the fight against cancer research , but is much other areas . 
measures , unfortunately , this new threats and diseases , and in many cases the current medicines are enough to the community . medical duty is to modern or more effective ways to these challenges . 
the vote will take place tomorrow at 12.30 p.m . 
it , what the council , the commission and of course parliament on the environment , public health and consumer policy committee agreed , so that is should second reading so that these programmes and to continue unremittingly , that would gaps , was , that these four programme will continue two years , so as the commission asked , but the to money for by one , so that if a new programme is adopted , and it will into force välivuotena , then is , of course , need continuation and funding for another . 
generally , member states is high time to agreement of the european union leeway wider and more budget : diseases are feeling borders . 
international organisations as europol are assessed , that drugs imports union is in fact increasing . 
public health is national policy , and it must be in . 
the next item is the debate cerdeira 's the committee on civil liberties and rights and justice and home affairs committee report ( a5-0355 / 2000 ) portuguese republic initiative the council framework decision to crime victims of in criminal proceedings ( 9650 / 2000 - c5-0392 / 00 - 2000 / 0813 ( cns ) ) . 
the second international level initiative is the united nations declaration oikeusperiaatteista , which the crime and power abuse victims , and it is adopted on 29 november the united nations general assembly resolution 1985 40 / 34 . 
you will recall perhaps so so-called di pietro report on debate , which was here parliament a time ago . 
this initiative is three fundamental objectives : victims right information , legal certainty and right to compensation . 
i think it is important , however , that finally also union level awareness need to aspect , which on the basis of the measures crime in the . 
member states should obliges to specific the police are patrolling crime victims for . 
italy is several times asked this have murderers of extradition france - which lojacono is free - so that he could finally to sentence . 
attention is always be crime which . 
as you heard , proposal for a framework decision contains three measures : firstly , it is minimum victims rights ; secondly , it is specific rules , which to the role of the individual , which are crime of other member state as at home , and thirdly , it encourage countries to develop measures to support victims . 
the commission is already national victims in those services concerned the european level networking support , to ensure proper for victims , then , when they are oleskele there , where a crime happened . 
the previous sitting approval of the 
mr president , i am sure my the committee on fisheries , which is this the , is again the floor . 
very well . 
we have just concluded the council and parliament common statement to the three institutions on tuesday last meeting . 
we this , managed to a solution the 2001 budget . 
we is consider together , how we all the ylentämispolitiikkaan the necessary measures so , that procedures will open . 
we islands name , and us was : ' it is words must say ' . 
the council has therefore the second reading of the agreements with parliament delegation and sought the for to accept a budget , which would allow the european union all priorities funding and to real needs and which real ability to appropriations . 
the second reading the third important point concerns the ' employment ' programme to continue and supplementary ' entrepreneurship ' programme for the 2001 - 2005 . 
generally , i would like to emphasise that the next few days , the budgetary procedure outgoing is proved 6 may 1999 the institutions between the the importance of . 
discussions were sometimes strict , but they were always material , and they were based on a dialogue , which helped us to understand each other better and therefore to more on , which i hope satisfactory all . 
this dimension and relationship is certainly stress . can really say , that foreign policy in the european union policy is a effect also now , budgetary effort and i fully convinced that , that is community policy to that in the balkans is , in democratisation and that we hopes the is the vakautumisesta . 
the use of two year running in can really must - i think wrongly - a financial perspective a review . 
we have heard today the council , that the it is prepared to sum 3.5 % . 
thank you very much the particularly the commission and the council . 
mr president , i too i would like to thank mr haug his excellent work . 
i think insuring , flexibility is small sums and amendment large sums , but we see it in the years . 
we now is to decide , whether we next thursday this budget for or are we . it is of course consider very carefully . 
three institutions between agreements are also important . the should guarantee us a common suunnitteluvarmuus . 
these are the problems before all unemployment , the bse crisis and the balkans vakautuspakettia . 
. ( fr ) mr president , ladies and gentlemen , the european parliament is a pleasure i be today you enjoy being amongst you , to you the french presidency of the last months and about the progress . 
we promised , that nice is unresolved questions . 
it concerns closer cooperation procedure , which considerably that money at first and third pillar . 
it is the enormous challenge and historic in our continent jälleenyhdistämisessä . 
charter of fundamental rights to union , and a better protection dignity , freedom and solidarity concepts , which is based on union . 
a few weeks ago was kemikaalitankkeri the sun up to be the channel islands close to . 
we set ourselves objectives , they is now been achieved . 
mr president , ladies and gentlemen , i believe the european parliament can say today , that the six months the union is strengthened for new to members , to family one now , when we know to measures together . union is also confirmed its its citizens hearts values , growth and employment , solidarity , security and european social model of area . 
( applause ) 
this is could avoid , when we into account the approach , but the more reason to disappointing result : the therefore , that result is qualified majority voting achieving more difficult and to therefore easier , although in an expanding union decision-making coherence , just the opposite effect need ; 
( applause ) 
( applause ) 
nice summit european objectives were more ambitious than any other summit objectives many years . 
mr president , mr president republic , mr the commission president , ladies and gentlemen , my group condemns the 15 member states the poor proposal , which are certainly european very were puzzled about what proved , which is the main leaders common view , solidarity and mutual confidence real situation . 
all selväjärkisille people they are serious consequences , which 27 or 28 member states : the structure similar to spain europe would . 
mr president , let me also to emphasise , that france was nice summit once again it is only . 
mr president , mr president , democracy and diversity europe group regrets it , that presidency not answered message , which it was already in july last . 
many are still see the port , which the european union is to one day to . 
therefore there is the , which must to of . 
i believe , that it is not only these three group opinion but also other groups , which are , however , have to sign the technical reasons . 
is good to medicines development community , because therefore improve patients of benefit effective hoitokeinoista . 
. ( i ) i congratulate my colleague mary honeyballia his first report the european parliament . 
mr fatuzzo is suddenly the floor , and i tense , who pensioner is now told him what ! 
victims is personally , which is be treated very complicated and dire situations to contend situation - situation , which is probably much more difficult , if a crime is other member state as victims in . 
the next item is the joint debate the following issues : 
was regrettable see discussions on the country , which must one voice more or less , which to germany or france , belgium , portugal or the netherlands or spain . 
we welcome the , that is now taking the new procedure , and we hope , that closer cooperation provision for such , i hope the europe to their forward and can to constitution , which citizens i believe this to the european construction excellent project . 
member states , which are enlargement , take our own member states egotism example . 
some are the result just will not accept than others , but the issue is clear : the treaty of nice , europe can now to turn itself into an democratic eu : to , which is close to all , citizens . 
subjective right was . 
because the treaty was agreement last currently , ' eu leadership ' crisis , which should on a consistent open set enlargement , but we can to question , which once overcome crisis we must now to . 
i do not believe , that is more realistic to their own national authority to strengthen the union as efficiency , and i do not believe , for that the european citizens would been on chad , how their countries authorities liehuttavat tickets in nice . 
and it is this a project 11 years after the berlin wall . 
the they sides of the europe , and now we is develop them in europe , the . 
nice is can no longer after to institutional charges have on . 
the first is the council institutional imbalance : is much weight but the commission and parliament little . 
this procedure is time now . 
consequences for europe would been incalculable . 
you know , for example , that the european union at the beginning määrävähemmistöön was so so-called ' two great ' countries , and now the need three . 
framework ; all that is front , enlargement is the european parliament is possible , in the direction , and the ideas . 
the european public interest , which no one is alone define - minister moscovici was this right - is cannot consist of conflicting and another mitätöivien national interests amount , and this , prime minister verhofstadt message was welcome . 
recommended the ratification . 
i think i of the in is take account of the number of the european parliament , as is , the council and as should have to . 
mr president , nice is but not the time , but it is starting point out the new path , which is much challenges . 
i would like therefore to one point , which is today already been a few again . 
although it seems , that we managed to avoid in future the european enlarged union complete paralysis , so the france is achieved its treaties in question . 
mr president , nice summit must me out of rejected . 
i do not know , will the commission to this debate , but i wonder at the end of the council absent , is the commission , as much to , that to 2004 by the european parliament is tsekkiläisiä , from and poles members and members baltic countries . 
we concealing it , that we must forward as to the enlargement and determination than before , nice so that we can to achieve our objectives ourselves , and enlargement is the historic event , parliament and the commission which is to completed to . 
and , before all the balkans the funding problem is been fully open future years , . 
i too would like to congratulate the rapporteurs , the committee on budgets president-in-office , the commission , the council and the work , which they have done to time , the which , we can vote the 2001 budget . 
is also a good thing , that small and medium-sized companies introduced the additional resources , is because they are the source of employment . this create new jobs , and fight against unemployment will continue . 
jalkapallotermein , it is tasapeli 1500 million . 
although we is budget and we agreed many this conciliation , we must imagine , that all problem are disappeared . 
this important task is but not starting from scratch us , but it provides for the treaties , although the council is sometimes difficult to it . 
this , the commission members is commitment to human and material resources fairly and effectively different policies to , , their is be in parliament and the political priority administrative priority . 
that is why the environment and the protection of the european level is promote jointly . 
after nice process of much . 
you have of course right to refer to the still this question . 
is not no longer question of military violence fear and possibly further to dictatorship . 
when this will thoroughly , is clear , that russia is a little more important than budget , but it morocco is i think not true . 
should very dangerous situation , if european would logistically dependent on russia . 
tacis-ohjelmaankin can only to limited , because it is only a drop in . 
birth rate decreasing and mortality is , and russia population nettomenetys is a million people a year . 
the president putin is said - and cannot be inferior to him - that chechnya , the role the question not . 
west is not no matter , because what russia , the people and the society is . 
mr president , the european union is adopted last years in different russia on documents , which are good basis most effective relations russia federation . 
and it , , what freedom means chechens ? 
it is the first step ; it after to to the , that laws can respect , which is the second step , economic development . stabilise , and further the result is civil society features . 
it is an excellent report , but which , as in strategiassakin , the , how important the european union and russia between strategic partnership - relationship - is us . 
this means our the avainalueille as the environment - which many members have referred to - and nuclear safety , itself kaliningrad and improving coordination between different sources of funding . 
we is avoid it at the beginning of this century the mistake , which mr referred to earlier , when russia was effectively and have disastrous consequences european issues the europe since 1917 leninistien revolution after . 
. ( fr ) as you know , the council is adopted common position directive 90 / 220 / eec of . 
i believe therefore , that the answer your questions is the . 
i therefore prepared to propose , that this is the debate , it must only to better time . 
i is not enough precise information to to reply to your supplementary . 
he is not cannot answer that he is not , the precise information . 
. ( fr ) the council to commissioner alcohol and tobacco fraud on conclusions , which it adopted on 19 may 1998 of meeting . 
all member states confirmed that to fraud combating at national level so as countries both between and . 
the european union is assured several times respect fully asylum law . 
this in , signed in june 2000 signed akt-ey-kumppanuussopimuksessa states , that community must at the latest by 2005 by to cannot be argued access to market of of the developed countries from the products . 
i would remind you that the council , president not here to a a authority opinion , it is not a a government , but to is to which the council position , is a currently . 
these testaamattomille be shown to be introduced and tuhoamisjärjestelmä , which growers with the price of a . 
the france is tried until the european solution to this crisis , which is food crisis , social crisis and vote crisis . 
. ( fr ) the barcelona process in algeria , to certain principles , which is , including respect for the rule of law . 
- ( fr ) i already a few weeks ago to you some comments in september 2001 in children on global summit a the united nations general assembly special session to preparations for . 
subject : turkey obligations and the eu and the turkey kumppanuusjärjestelyt the european union and turkey types of actor on the commission proposal between calls on european council to the year 2004 the situation by possible outstanding the disputes , . 
will the council make the partnership to this issue the government with turkey ? 
yes defence rights and is mutual recognition ? 
each member state is at national level and independently decision national troops on operations . 
subject : taxes of the internal market of the commission president prodi assure now november in financial times of in an article that he is , do not want , that the eu in tax are harmonisation and common decision levels for tax . he to that , on ' are and remain national parliaments under control ' . 
questions 2332 will be replied to in writing . 
the european union and croatia stabilisation and association agreement republic is appropriate time . 
mr president , mr the commissioner , ladies and gentlemen , i would like firstly to congratulate for mr baltasia his report , before all also his his report quickly , because was important and right to quickly in croatia the changes - mr stenzel already mentioned this . 
in this area is really achieved positive development . 
in 1991 and 1992 enormous frustration , western and itä-slavoniasta were more than 250 000 north of bosnia . 
this is , of course , been historic year as we call . 
this is not at all bad one year result . 
this is us important point , and i hope , that we can count on parliament support , when will you officially to hear the after , when the is negotiated . 
wahid government points great resistance , and process seems to pysähtyvän . 
also papua leaders are still in . 
we also in our resolution the european the commission to this approach . 
the commission this year at the beginning of the communication wording are therefore justified , although they are a way of those changes will of hyvänolontunteen afflicted by . 
to be realised means right and ongoing change refugee are places , which indonesia former and the authorities take one and the is clear fragile democratisation . 
the most worrying of all this is the moluccas , where jihad-taistelijat can continue to way , which is impossible accept . 
also irian jaya have given the is been held on integrating migration victims . 
that is why we must is to priorities , because we cannot confuse the environment , social policy and economic policy of questions at the same pakkaan priority problem , democracy and respect for human rights with , which is clearly be a political priority in our relations with indonesia . 
the resolution to fully unequivocally , that irian jaya have given the is part of indonesia . 
the situation is improved , and we encourage is pledge our support to president , but remaining is still terrible problems . 
of course is impossible accept it , that tens of thousands of east timor refugees is still unacceptable of armed traffickers , which it is the name at the mercy of the past are to criminal without impunity . 
it is important for their owners , - it is the fourthly the country of the population ; it is important economic credible within the framework of ; it is important regional status , and it is also important ympäristövaikutuksensa therefore . 
that is why we is to police forces and administrative and penal forces and instruments so member states between the eu than in . 
( president to speaker off ) . 
the commission commissioner schreyer , you have repeatedly stressed parliament , that you view the you task fight against fraud as the commission as a member of is particularly to ensure olaf independence . 
problems to the eu : the level the financial creation , because they eu the the taxpayers ' money of the models , which so so-called ' community ' is produced , are badly worded and in many cases fully unwanted . 
i would like really warmly to congratulate the rapporteur , this report which i and which i personally and as a politician , but unfortunately i cannot . 
report on it , how protecting community economic interests and how it is . these are the questions . 
because time is limited , the each point only briefly . 
the debate is closed . 
we is eu : the laws to protect companies in mismanagement , , and the commission is now promised to introduce own regulations to ensure a payment . 
earlier ignored that fraud in bringing to light is other mechanisms . 
mr commissioner schreyer , the commission you referred just the council and said , that one member state opposed european public prosecutor of . 
that is why i think parliament is very sensibly said the court of auditors , what exactly it , expect these kertomuksilta . 
opportunity tackle responsibility is not given the more than the commission nor the member states , especially by responsibility is always to . 
he said that quite sincerely and was regrets the , that things were so . 
the commission and the court of auditors of the negotiations the report was very appropriate and i think you also very the selfconfident movement of act . 
you will have my so , i think that is sensible to debate these proposals to the way , which can be responsibility to more clearly . 
the first is a lack of inadequate harmonisation . 
it is , i believe we improve also article 4 . 
in the single market investors , were they ago private companies or people , pension funds , must be to owners rights the companies benefit , which they invest , and the sijoittaneiden benefit . 
we cannot deny the truth : when yritysosto is , is also staff on structural reforms , redundancies , these are ... such measures , which really is impact jobs . 
what we however , we risk parliament to tabled amendments that ? 
this is principle , which we be tomorrow different with the most important issue which should , which the must to acquisitions of the law . 
it should instead easier to problem , which concerns it , which valvontaviranomaisella should be jurisdiction . 
the rapporteur amendments create confusion area , and we wrong if we vote possible future in confusion for . 
i would like to the it this discussed in this house the point , that the debate is to firmly back voters and the millions of people in , which is arvopaperimarkkinasijoituksiin based on advocated uk-style self-select pension and savings . 
this procedure , which is there already in some member states , is also not only public ostotarjouksiin but is much wider , and it could possibly to it , the commission , when will change company law in general . 
let me finally to you , that this is the framework directive , which is parliament earlier stage expressed by desire . 
resale right is creative artist an inalienable right of artists in the use of further . 
the british interests fear loss of jobs . 
this , the council adopted by compromise is placed on only the commission echoes the original proposal , which the european parliament support widely at first reading . 
i hope the commission also support , at least together three most important controversial issue . 
question is also the european art market and competitiveness proof of . 
second , series of pictures should undoubtedly been in elsewhere , in the united states . 
this amendment can only accept in part . 
postal services competition 
mr savary , just this i i proposed . 
firstly : we is pay attention to , that we trade favourable prices . secondly , we pay attention to , is that services are high-quality , and thirdly , that we can to ensure , that postal services is very available throughout the european union . 
the committee on legal affairs committee most stringent requirements universal service providers of services for hintarajoja , but the proposal 150 grammes painorajasta is also strict , and it rejects the proposal for a directive unanimously 50 grammes also . 
we also cannot accept the new liberalisation timetable , if not the first been assessment . 
you know , how difficult this issue is , because the is ideological ballast , sometimes and from the right that from the left . 
although some people may parliament must proposal welcome , it should had a devastating effect the european union postal services . the 
proposal would also rural post offices closure , because the postal services are a . 
if we this pace , so we need 100 years open to expand on the existing in europe . 
mr president , i would like to three attention . 
we should say directly a point when we are discussing , this new directive . 
this is not and need be . 
equal in the monopolistit are opportunity , shows that they dominate in . 
if grandmother is pleased , however , the kind that postman is , which is also postal services high quality , it is not to us sorrow that we saw but also welcome us . 
failure is not , surprised , if the person is prepared negotiations so badly , is not tabled in the 1997 directive adopted the effects on report and argues in favour ideologically - just you you mentioned objectives we achieve only if we are , release , and release . 
the commission commissioner bolkestein , the commission is agreements controller . 
the same thing should , if fabulously wealthy mafia case and poverty-stricken populations in income , which should average , of course , no satisfactory , but no one is cannot must it socially satisfactory , because there is rutiköyhä . 
mr simpson , we are now new times . 
it are implemented socialist but conservative and liberaalihallitukset . 
the , when proposal was presented , i knew , that it never accept the commission presented by form . 
this opening up and this liberalization of the we all agree with , but it is important pace . 
the first directive effects is not published , because the consequences is not confusion the directive would job losses and conditions of employment for universal service , unequal distribution division in the union and especially in rural areas and in working class neighbourhoods . 
the commission proposes a competition opening of , which i think i guarantee consumers better services low-cost price . 
it is necessary suoramainontapostin development . 
i directly brittikonservatiiveihin . 
i would like to say cambodian service the following : if this happens , you valuable breathing space . 
the only mixed undertakings is hope , that one day we would overtake the status and to self-satisfied belgian diplomatic machine korporativismin , so that we can in the develop europe . 
only three % kirjemarkkinoista is been released . 
technology power and the consumers reject it , because they are value for money must consumers . 
only real competition resumption of suffering from serious diseases and gradually and agreed timetable help them in this . 
i can accept amendments 60 and 61 principle , which concerns the completion of the internal market , which is coming at a reasonable period within . 
the commission to the same opinion there , so the commission proposal on the basis of the council will now take action . 
however , is now up to parliament to this position . 
the second my report to certainly a great deal of the first , and to the amendments adopted in plenary . 
mr commissioner , the commission is certain , that we to certain reservations and käsityseroista . 
mr president , mr the commissioner , ladies and gentlemen parliament , i would like firstly to congratulate the rapporteur , which is very daryä clearly commented on us reform , the history and produced a synthesis and i will not repeat them . 
this production is a particular areas , outermost regions community , which is in many , difficult be competitive market and which one few products is the bananas . 
it in fact , because it prevent chaos is to rules , which we all we . 
is not exaggeration to say , that this question is one in all institutions most attention and dispute issues . 
we is still simply provide these producers toimeentulokeinot buying primarily their products . 
mr president , the rapporteur deserves thanks and some of the sympathy , how he is dealt with this difficult report . 
i thank parliament also political groups chairmen , which are and outermost regions put members härkäpäisyyden and itsepäisyyden the , so that we can today to discuss this parliament banana reform of the proposal and we can to a position and we this in time prepared by the council meeting in agriculture , and we can to to 2001 with banana common organisation of the market on reform . 
in this debate is been much the , how agriculture and rural development committee support of unanimously dary report . 
ladies and gentlemen , i is honour to you , that official in the gallery is present korea republic parliament delegation . 
the council , is to been positive complement the media programme the decision . 
trakatellis , on the environment , public health and consumer policy committee report ( a5-0377 / 2000 ) the european parliament and the council proposal for a certain decisions of the no 96 / ec / 645 candidates entered on , the : no 646 kurds have disembarked / 96 / ec , the : no 647 / 96 / ec , the : no 102 / 97 / ec , the : no causes / 97 / ec and the : no 1296 / 1999 / ec adopted of action programmes continuing and these decisions to amend ( com ( 2000 ) 448 - c5-0400 / 2000 - 2000 / 0192 ( cod ) ) 
mr president , i would like only to take this opportunity to remind the commission and commissioner last night at 0.15 a.m . to intervention , to amendment no 1 , that the commission to take action to fact . 
( parliament adopted the oral amendment ) . 
amendment no 2 : 
parliament is to have this and to most amendments - which the varoitustekstin a list of ingredients , and consumer protection and particularly young people . 
is this proviso therefore , that of parliament as the citizens of two group : conservation and the health , which can be economic interests on behalf of jeopardise ? 
. ( i ) i would like particularly to , why i voted a tar or nikotiinipitoisuuden cross-border tobacco ban against and why i supported amendments , which seeks to ban . 
mr president , i welcome the radical decision , that cigarette images seem to smoking the in chickens , as canada is . 
i all this is positive , although i hope , that - and i say it in this context - much more resources to diseases prevention . 
i would caching , that this provision should been regulation , which would on the european union more all citizens for services . 
the amendments mean " droit de suite mean the european elinvoimaisille taidemarkkinoille and job losses , and i fear , that very few alive the artist will resale right . 
. ( nl ) i would like to thank mr zimmerling for his work on this laborious document . 
i am forced to vote against directive . 
are nor stabilisation and association agreement , the cards programme or the european investment bank unable to of the european union as , which could to croatia economic and social development . 
the indonesian government and army is to guarantee security of its citizens and life , the , what they are one or other religion . 
it is , we quickly as possible to the necessary instruments , so that we can to eu : the resources on combating fraud . 
eu form this a judicial area such crimes of studies , syytteeseenpanossa and trials and judgements implementation . 
it seems , that we sometimes forgotten this fact . 
amendments 11 and 13 to the , that only 10 years after the quota system to new study and now the commission to sitouduttaisi and many our trading partners to tullijärjestelmään . 
acp countries for etuustullia on recital of , we also support in this context eur 300 per tonne , but we as the word ' up ' . 
a cushion should hardly nor of our trading partners to approval . 
the next item is the commission statement on the eu and the united states summit . 
i admit , that this is more been said as been , but we should to avoid - and i know , that foreign minister mrs albright is agree with - it temptation , that summits is too much daily political and economic relations can . 
one of the most important lessons was , that european must to a more responsibility on the european security . 
i would grateful , if you respect when he addresses this subject in kevääksi kaavaillussa communication and to make parliament another six months by analysis , also in all matters proposals the , how we can to achieve in future we new objectives , dialogues and foreign policy cooperation and security policy in these matters also käytäntövaltaisissa , for example agreements mutual recognition . 
i know also ' everything but arms ' initiative ' and i welcome it , and i would urge the commission summit , to the united states once in this initiative . 
we therefore is to prevent the irreversible act , which expect sometimes for years kuolemanselleissä those people doomed , as mumia mumia abu-jamal case or are led by the pelletier ' . 
this is a good idea , and we it without the other . 
thank you very much , mr the commissioner . 
i fear , that i had in this , as you know own from my group . 
thirdly , is to introduce simple ways taxes on and in practice adopt so been said ' keep taxation ' . 
the first conclusion is , that only little is to be done so long as these international agreements is amended . 
. ( i ) mr president , committee would like to say first , that the current arrangements are at a in the next services providers eu : in the software , a tietokonepalvelujen , the disruption of websites ylläpitämispalvelujen , planning and information services . 
i thought always , that the next matter should be one of the most important legislator rules or principles : ' is superfluous to create legislation , which is to be implemented . 
i am pleased , that report is partly thanks to the committee on the environment again many important point , the elements , which the reasons are must enough support on transport and tourism . 
at the same time we support it , however , is that in on the the convention was , so that we a second system international area . 
one country short long-term sijaintipaikkaedut the second or other eu : the member states . 
mr president , europe will world leader in the internet decade in future . 
mr commissioner , the commission many asks really it , why european will always so quickly introduce new taxes and new rules ? 
the convention is in this , fully outdated . 
i should common vat system , the priority , and not with it , that a common system should have to introduce long ago . 
tax levels in less than 30 % usa to more hundreds of billions dollars , paid budjettiylijäämät . 
preferable solution is to vat the european electronic services tarjoavilta companies , so that they should similar field than our and other world companies . 
fiscal competitiveness is citizens and economic interests in . 
therefore union outside operators to community operators with the same verovelvoitteiden the these operators in providing services consumers the is obliged to register arvonlisäverovelvolliseksi reside member state , when the transaction is elected state arvonlisäveroastetta . 
so it is quite simple but not . 
source of income , which tax should position , is concern , and i believe , that debate , which concerns the countries of companies , which can registered , will difficult and that it will of course , that the united states is to the wto : to . 
is not no sense , that , for example , virgin airways survival was clearly to report from london to brussels pay only 89 £ , when i pay is about the same £ 250 to , if i eurostar-junaa , which is much less greenhouse gases and which is much more convenient way to . 
mr president , this is the debate to old disputes . 
the french presidency is also discussed the proposals , which the - should be kuluttamispaikassa and which includes the service provider in all member states registration . 
this would harm the european airlines compared with third countries , and it airlines distort so eu : the internal than intercontinental hintarakenteita . 
solution , which is not capital inflow of europe , can i believe to but only oecd : the , and this currently individual negotiations through . 
i aware of the , that between mixed views bewildering many parliament members . 
because way we macro-economic and similar criteria into mutkikkuudelta . 
let me now to the proposal still need a minimum of . 
this , icao working groups is still to any significant preparatory work , and is unlikely , that already in the next general assembly is the decision the opening up new negotiations . 
such feelings live unfortunately still still the european citizens in . 
the last this directive is objectives , that is at sea whenever our management , so that is refuge made of obligation , prohibits merillelähtö hard storms in and to rannikkovaltiolle more powers to action at sea serious pilaantumisriskin the it . 
oil companies say us , that they guarantee fund is voluntary . 
i would like , that in nice impetus from the doubts are fallen , , as some countries , and that we vastustelu our . 
we believe , his want guarantee maritime safety , because his is reason to know , that not week goes by , that someone to us more question : what you the european parliament members ago you maritime safety to guarantee and rules to change ? 
mr president , the commission is aware , that the one the plans , which the uk government announced on 8 november 2000 , was to introduce a ' vinjettimallinen ' , which on road toll was now all liikenteenharjoittajilta , which use the uk maantieverkostoa , whether they ago british or not . 
secondly , if the originally intended as minister he proposes foreign lorries on their own country operators to support , it is community legislation against ? 
this economic an unbalance there , which is liikenteenharjoittajilta different member states grandfathering payments and tax between , distort the conditions , which in different nations in the uk represent liikenteenharjoittavat competition . 
meat and meat and bonemeal of the question : the imports governed exactly the way the legislation through , which we meat and meat and bonemeal the european union . the demand , for example , the removal of the meat and meat and luujauhosta is been the legislation and will into force on 1 march 2001 . 
jews are fraudsters who spread and dishonest people . 
i hope , that really see , that education and training to the every country tolerance rather than intolerance . 
monti answer is been surprising . 
question no 37 ( h-0900 / 00 ) : 
the commission also proposes at the same time what is needed temporary system , which is designed in particular to lead to unfair practices korea so long as is necessary , so that wto : the procedure is concluded . 
this is extremely serious subject . 
koksin käyttöteollisuus employs a total of 70 000 people , but the product of the costs is very marginal , about 2 % . 
question no 40 ( h-0889 / 00 ) : 
we our proposal acp countries in the same time as member states . 
i would like reassure you by saying , however , that initiative to not to market regulation , because acp countries community market possibly of sugar surplus is very little . 
unfortunately , these countries is position , not no to the negotiations , so it is promises , which we task is i think unilaterally without any are . 
the commission procedure , which concerns in economic support for , is completion and it also covers the funds , which recently needs for 2001 . 
in this area is three measures . 
the commission proposal is not the future of the court of justice . 
i am sure , not what mr commissioner means ' enlargement ' . 
. ( nl ) berenguer fuster question on trade marks . 
i it with our reform and to guarantee the , that is spain as soon as possible so as it should . 
the question you , that reason is the spanish and that you do it , which must do now , when this again is you syynne . 
it explained very earlier answer i received . 
directive 89 / 48 / eec on at least kolmivuotisesta of higher education the qualifications . 
subject : transport links northern straits vaasa ( , suomi-uumaja , sweden ) maritime transport baltic northern straits is drawing to a close working without levels of tax-free-myyntiin . 
for example in this i referred vasa in is two last year in lost 550 jobs in tourism is perhaps just this on sales lakkaamisen therefore . 
proposal reflects the lisbon summit objective , in that proposal is to digital content development and use . 
i urge the commission also to ehdotuspyynnöille more effective and faster the tight enforcement procedures . 
if we wish to only companies useful content particularly meteorological areas and geographically-speaking areas , which is of course desirable , we must not forget , however , that citizens for content of is much more complicated than only companies useful information a . 
digital content , which is more than the number of quality , expressed and reduced to cultural and social diversity . 
the second issue , which seems to me quite as , is it , we think that small and medium-sized companies and just established companies . 
if we do however , the need for mother of invention , we are the simply around and recognize and do languages obstacles rather than it will be possible and welcome as , it is basis european market and one independence . 
i will all programme objectives : objectives is to create favourable conditions european digital content massive push towards the , processing and for , to promote economic action , to improve employment prospects and to the european sisältöpotentiaalin exploitation of the united states to . 
the european multilingual digital content production with the conditions of is therefore always only greater . 
some amendments are really very valuable in itself , but they are more other instruments as this decision . 
we can now to different positions , the vote is not this evening , and the if parliament the group is it with , that is should vote tomorrow , so i should much korrektimpaa to a proposal tomorrow täysilukuisessa parliament votes , as this evening . 
. ( nl ) mr president , ladies and gentlemen , ladies and gentlemen , women and still more the european citizens are noise . 
member states can freely to , and it evening when the next night are . 
the , i welcome the commission proposal on , but i it first and too cautious regarded as a . 
noise reduction and prevention is therefore be in future an essential part of european environmental policy . 
confederal group of united left supports him it to , although we wanted to more advanced solutions and to the measures on , which deserve money closure noise . 
i would like to little but the groups within our committee and fight , which is last recently been behind the scenes , in many different committees and the just just here . 
this is , what i will , that my country is very difficult accept the commission proposal , if the is included in sufficient flexibility , which , it can to lifestyle , which we inherit from our forefathers - and which the and the spanish that we are foreign can appreciates . 
i would recommend this report , and parliament , of course , the commission proposal . 
secondly , we is quality standards on daughter directives . 
back fully the need to harmonise noise and ambient , the melukarttoihin the area , the action plans , of which is intended to reduce noise and to protect vähämeluisia areas , where there it is appropriate , and to the people information dimension . 
secondly , proposal is new approach , which is the european general melutilannetta the the , how many people noise it . 
the following amendments can accept in principle or in part the amendments 6 , 7 , 12 , 13 , 17 , 21 , 22 , 25 , 28 , 29 , 32 , 39 , 42 , 44 and 45 . 
additives is , generally to be unprocessed food , which is not been in any way , which must a essential change food original in , as is the case in this case . 
mr president , we voted committee on the environment appealing with lannoye report for , and report is otherwise fully we our . 
no one is not saying that no . 
the next item is the debate on the european parliament staes report ( the a5-372 / 2000 ) the conciliation committee the common text the european parliament and the council for a directive feed official control of the principles of the council directive 95 / 53 / ec the . 
i received the a very clear reason , very clear message ' well passaran ' . 
in the conciliation committee , the negotiations found now compromise , which can accept the insurance it , that the commission by on is the until , until they is replaced by another decision , and that member states is duty to controls on the ground for the commission and member states ' experts all aid ' . 
i welcome this legislation . 
mainly the european social fund and national finance ministries of the structural funds is always be our society disadvantaged and poorest regions development . 
the european cities are important economic , political and socio-cultural centres . 
clear legislation and its monitoring are also precise one instrument . 
the commission is also grateful the considerable support , which the european parliament is given this proposal , and many useful amendments , which is been . 
when takes into account , what work is , , the commission cannot accept amendments 10 and 23 . 
i say it famous therefore , that subject is , and you have become predominant certainly agree with me , when i say , the that a day without , that the precautionary principle newspapers otsikoisivat right or wrong , wrongly , but most detained on fabricated charges only . 
most radical text of tabled are the innovation and progress , when again insist that mielipidesuuntausta represent believe , that the precautionary principle should to only situations , which is it important health or ympäristövaarasta , , situations , which is a riskikynnys , which is to define , although right known how ! 
division of labour clarification is an absolute prerequisite for , if is to public confidence and scientific community that public decision-makers , us politicians . 
in situations to forward as a witness varmuusmarginaalia . 
we also , that the world trade organisation wto : in the action be taken to a although regulation , which will guarantee that the wto , the , is possible to develop other obligations , as the , which is multilateral ympäristösopimuksissa , so that we can to the precautionary principle dimension . 
of course is also important to oikeusvoimaa , so that the precautionary principle to international law standard . 
life is it right , that risks and uncertainty can be right . 
when it to it too much and trivialized by being subjected it , when , too little , when it is us bad blood . 
as example , for example , are children toys the phthalates . we is a strange to exactly appeared out of toys makeisiin , jäätelöön and the other kelpaavaan . 
the same concerns the commission for the following thorough riskianalyysistä . 
resolution calls on the commission to the guidelines and to the precautionary principle of always , when it is necessary , when the commission will legislative initiatives and in all its actions . 
is not possible to general vähimmäiskynnyksestä . 
when the european parliament , the first time sakharov prize ihmisoikeuksin for union within the was approved but , it confirmed therefore , that solemnly all human rights violations is of we must . 
mr president , ladies and gentlemen , parliament kansalaisryhmämme ' of thirty-nine-year-old ya ' wants before all to parliament kiitollisuutensa us today restructurings have valuable recognition . 
and it not only murders . 
i therefore to me in this and in me in this matter . 
( parliament adopted the legislative resolution ) . 
mr president , if parliament allows , i would like to oral comment tarkistusehdotuksestani 51 . 
mr garcía-margallo y marfil , on behalf economic and monetary affairs committee report ( a5-0334 / 2000 ) the commission communication to the council , the european parliament , economic and social committee and regions to ilmailupolttoaineiden ( com ( 2000 taxation ) 110 - 2000 c5-0207 / - 2000 / 2114 ( cos ) ) 
this agreement is attractive some companies for but bad for the environment and democracy . 
the previous our budgetary debates . that events is undoubtedly mad cow disease crisis the . 
it would clearly the and the hallituksenpäämiesten the toimipaikkakysymystä decisions on the letter and spirit . 
parliament is managed to of its priorities , including - to investment in the fight against unemployment and poverty , to a number of important environmental and working and so still . we voted against the right attacks and the european women 's lobby life frontières against . 
the kosovo appropriations of raises but quite legitimate doubts , in this area is the real capacity to they 350 million eur , which it was the originally intended to in 2001 . 
is not no reason to tax incentives a jakelumuodolle . 
a date of a clear message to expand on the existing operators and improve national monopolies of to market liberalisation . 
can we be the one single decision , which must possibly a small majority support , a whole postal services concept , which is a and express my appreciation of each member state in specific ? 
the commission proposed by the , which are 50 grammes and price for two and a half times normal price , are really too intemperate , and they should been disastrous effects yleispostipalveluiden providers . 
that is why we are clearly and strongly the objectives , which proposal to . 
. ( sv ) we believe that the eu is not to the regard to the issue , although proposal seems committee after much better than the original proposal . 
dary report ( a5-0374 / 2000 ) 
we but it with , that the small farmers , who work on their farms to rob anyone , and their income is protect this war , the suhdannevaihteluista . 
article 10 the freedom of speech that the obligations and responsibilities , which can lead to conditions , restrictions and sanctions . 
this initiative can be only pleased , when we know , that european digital content value is the european gdp the from 5 % and that is 4 million jobs in . 
this , in the united states the coherence and unity are helped to guarantee the future that these market . 
i hope also that , in 2004 will powers distribution by the principle of subsidiarity , so that nations can to position within union . 
we can only welcome this . 
for example earlier in trade negotiations national parliaments is the last power of ratification , and one country if it is in the council minority can no longer say ' is ' , if it interests are negotiations . 
we warned the many occasions , and the events in nice 103 should be fully very clearly , that much wider agenda should have to lead to , that this year we have not been a no results , which should been disastrous consequences for enlargement . 
. ( i ) when the it , how vital nice summit the decisions are , honour is give them , which it is . 
in other words parliament wants power taxation and social protection on issues . 
these night long the thrashing about in the council decisions are not firm support . the is large gaps , which fall through easily concepts such as transparency , identity creation , greater democracy , citizens participation or uudistushenkisyys . 
it is why we must also as a conclusions to the result , which in no one is not won or lost . 
the national democracies , it is therefore influence , that veto to the european parliament must further and more power . 
you is therefore vote for this measure , which is further aircraft taxation , because so plane tickets pay us more less and we can to more by air . 
' ' do not kerrostalojen , not to päähäsi cannot fall maljakko ! 
technological change and the process of transformation structural complexity and diversity require absolutely all local and regional level partners in the kehittämiskumppanuuksiin and strategic plan on regional policy development each region . 
we is to avoid all , which the or to these important conditions . 
to say , that innovation are all production process in the operators reach . 
even and development after that regions gap between technological development is namely considerably greater than the gdp . 
as you know , for the most important is to virheitten to avoid . 
i do not know , it was direct result of this risi-aloitteesta , that today three women signed european budget , but i am pleased , if this can you , which we , we could benefit women also in future . 
is also a mistake to appropriations this budget line , which was created for pilot projects and local and urban development of new ideas for which results were very successful which have been locally very of urban and interreg programmes such as the community . 
as mr rack rightly said , i not never been it , and i will never with ajattelemaankaan , that this regional policy and cohesion policy would of door , which is the poorest regions . 
this therefore when is a ohjelma-asiakirjaa ( development plans to give the negotiations which ) i innovative measures , also mainstreaming i particular attention to , that every submitting a planning supplement is regional plan for the information society , and it also , that i will check this regional programme the , i will check it also , how it is of such factors , which is direct effect small and medium-sized enterprises , koulutuslaitoksiin and even farms . 
members schroedter , izquierdo collado and ortuondo larrea are quite rightly tabled this biological sciences and for the question . 
the prices have fallen in the last and no in its 1999 this policy , by south korea . 
the committee was specifically background , that this vote subject is today 's sitting on the agenda . 
this view is otherwise in the treaty . i is not time to go into more . 
however , research and development assistance of the proposal , the world trade organisation been complaint korea situation work even tappiollisilla prices and possible temporary support measures so long , when complaint is pending , we believe that will be more or less weak ideas to solve , albeit still some ideas to solve . 
the korea pressure must to - if possible oecd : the in - taking action against dumping . 
we , we suffer unemployment , and quite others gentlemen are shipyards money . 
i think he is produced an excellent and real syväanalyysin the european laivanrakennusalasta . 
this process is that the quickly , and if it is loppuunsa , it may take two years even . 
mechanisms to , until wto : the procedure result is known . 
i am sure , that this , we all defend this vigorously and hard freedom in europe , but i would like to say , that in spain we need the european parliament the our commitment and so much their solidarity . 
sicily , waters in may sometimes the nuclear power station showed worrying signs the . 
alarming should , if we in this situation would immediately . 
both the proposal we the need for it , that two from countries , the kingdom and spain , are close cooperation , so that to find subject of the submarine repair , safer solution and , of course , be citizens closely for informed . 
we have heard the british sotalaivastosta vakuuteltavan , that fault is meaningless , and others , the opposite , it claim , that fault is bad and requires long and difficult corrections . 
i know parliament understand , that he should become here , if it should been possible , and that against his , . 
the commission has currently this plan . 
they are already taking place , so we is to be realistic to what alternatives , the uk and gibraltar authorities is at its disposal . 
controlled cooperation is the union method . 
the british government is , as russia government recently the one that are rusting away the maritime disaster in . 
mr president , i too i would like to express my deep spanish to eta view latest victim of . 
two months ago in its selväsanaisessa response and today to the commission responsibility was to issue , although it is people 's party by motion for a resolution myönnettykään . this proposal we have to other introducing further simplifications in therefore . 
gibraltar government prime minister peter caruana is wisely asked , that panel of experts should directly his under its authority . 
this is and is still believe that consistent and a position , which will guarantee best all concerned interests and safety . 
b5-0908 / 2000 maij-weggen and posselt on behalf of the ppe-de group ; 
in 1980 unhcr quite five million refugees . 
we today recognition of refugees high commissioner and all humanitarian work for people . 
. ( i ) mr president , the commission wants without other parliament , support unhcr : the 50th anniversary of the . 
i would like to a broad issue , which is closely to what parliament , mr earlier said . 
b5-0909 / 2000 pack and others on behalf of the ppe-de group ; 
and the last problem , which i would like to , is the events serbia and kosovo between border . 
there is milosevic , is belgrade puoluekongressiin . 
we believe that also in kosovo still between fighting ethnic groups mentaliteettien is change so , that is a mutual respect for . 
we can ourselves without any arrogance say also that the european union , is responded new situation very quickly . 
b5-0915 / 2000 medina ortega and others on behalf of the pse group ; 
b5-0918 / 2000 napoletano and others on behalf of the pse group ; 
chile government involvement , that general pinochet in chile should fair trial , and really now general pinochet is lost immunity and chile judicial authorities are begun him against trial . 
and let me remind , that is important , that we accept this common resolution , because pinochet is this currently in chile . this we have to his in in the uk . 
i say this knowing , that these are the european free alliance and parliament greens fundamental views . 
mr president , before i begin my speech as the other , i would like to condemn catalonia in spain on the importer aktiivipoliitikkoon and people 's party valtuutettuun on strike , which is why this people elected by mr was killed . 
this is why i welcome the , that my group and i believe the part of parliament of is not to , which crisis as parties use of . 
their lives at risk is great . 
human rights is abolished , it 's is set in stone and the president moktar trifi is so-called court on 25 december , as you just was . 
human rights , trade unions members , the view of academics , journalists and students give information the authorities of ahdisteluista . 
his health is very , very serious . 
all democrats daily harassment and löylytys are actually widespread . 
i hope , that chile legal system to continue to independence and efficiency in this case . 
we understand , that the european union delegations of are watched closely the political situation . 
finally , i would like to mention , that parliament is really important role , been , because it is increased awareness and in these issues the dialogue , and this parliament visits public debates . 
laurent gbagbo must be the real national sovinnontekopolitiikka , which includes ' côte d ' ivoire citizenship ' adjournment of the debate , racist ancien régime to and of democratic elections , of which any candidates is not outside , because without these measures riot and civil war dangers continue only contribution from those right-wingers . 
mr president , already months for côte d ' ivoire reports from news are raised justified in europe , and also in this house . 
conditions are : no one is to be discriminated against , must supporting military rule in been set up the court is be heads of state and is be involved palauttamisprosessissa contradictory messages without democracy , and also national reconciliation committee opinions is listen to . 
i , i believe côte d ' ivoire citizenship ' ' concept is fully justified . 
the president is the now left dozen paragraphs . 
mr president , the greens i , for that we we päätöslauselmaehdotuksemme out . 
mr president , i can confirm , what mr posselt said time ago . 
( the approved ) . 
these people for member states must to different policies , which the and the aid and costs to , particularly those disabled , which families are actually unable to the burden alone . 
mr president , i is pleasure to greens / european free alliance group to congratulate the rapporteur for and excellent report . 
today still more people live longer better health , better information and better management and for those who inhabit and pension systems , . 
before all member states governments and länder , municipalities and local administrations can do something in many suosituksin . 
this is based on respect being shown family , which all people are it . 
very often is so that people are their lives , the last years seriously and will fully lift platforms inoperable in and need all aid . 
finally , i would like to stress as in healthcare points . 
then was also , that women is need work therefore , that men enough work . 
many are this first its conclusion , that the ageing europe is obstacle . 
find the necessary resources , and the means to . 
many active older should motivate us all to a society for , which generations between solidarity is not only thought sentence . 
these measures is quality of life and economic livelihood on matters to different situations and land . 
we can only to together objectives for . 
yksilökohtaisia wishes and decisions for is be a harkintaraja . 
if someone to all our austrian colleague if lost the objects , i would ask to they , in particular , because his silmälasinsa , mr fatuzzo , mr flemminghän you was seen . 
text should also clearly include the measures particularly remote regions and their products forest of markings including for . 
a the second issue , which must to stress , is animal and environmentally friendly production methods use of europe . 
that is why i am pleased also the , that we in this week established the european parliament working group , which is biotechnology . 
community institutions viestintätoimien the is of course be able rather to particularly the are sucked away artificially through dealt with advertising . 
if been should parliament proposals , which are have here majority approval three times in this parliament already impotence , and which is the it , that land set aside under to grow legumes and clover and that these feeding in permitted , we should should been more animal perusravintoa , more valkuaispitoista feed . 
all the common sense it should producer , seller and professional organisations but is the european union to . 
we consider , is why we have the european union earlier industry to the available money . 
of course if we can to and to promote such food , which are better for the environment and which takes account of animal welfare , and sell the world market , we really its goal , which , in common agricultural policy was created . 
amendments 9 and 22 , which calls for the management committee , and particularly amendments 7 , 19 , 23 , 27 and which calls for more procedure for changes , can say that the commission , is to uniform procedure on provisions . 
all they , which say that , in europe to still enjoy food , are right . 
mr president , is scientifically been , that wine kohtuukulutus is one best means to prevent cancer , heart attacks are due , alzheimer 's disease and so still . 
. ( nl ) i would like to welcome appreciate the rapporteur work .